-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.02
0.024023568 = product of:
0.048047137 = sum of:
0.048047137 = product of:
0.19218855 = sum of:
0.19218855 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19218855 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36606508 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
-
Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.; Chen, J.: ¬A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks (2012)
0.02
0.01878015 = product of:
0.0375603 = sum of:
0.0375603 = product of:
0.0751206 = sum of:
0.0751206 = weight(_text_:x in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0751206 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23002104 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.02
0.018450757 = product of:
0.036901515 = sum of:
0.036901515 = product of:
0.07380303 = sum of:
0.07380303 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07380303 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19075422 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.: Do citation chimeras exist? : The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition (2019)
0.02
0.016097272 = product of:
0.032194544 = sum of:
0.032194544 = product of:
0.06438909 = sum of:
0.06438909 = weight(_text_:x in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06438909 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23002104 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Yang, B.; Rousseau, R.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.: How important is scientific software in bioinformatics research? : a comparative study between international and Chinese research communities (2018)
0.01
0.013414393 = product of:
0.026828786 = sum of:
0.026828786 = product of:
0.053657573 = sum of:
0.053657573 = weight(_text_:x in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053657573 = score(doc=4461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23002104 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.0110704545 = product of:
0.022140909 = sum of:
0.022140909 = product of:
0.044281818 = sum of:
0.044281818 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044281818 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19075422 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.0110704545 = product of:
0.022140909 = sum of:
0.022140909 = product of:
0.044281818 = sum of:
0.044281818 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044281818 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19075422 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.007380303 = product of:
0.014760606 = sum of:
0.014760606 = product of:
0.029521212 = sum of:
0.029521212 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029521212 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19075422 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05447273 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35