Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004) 0.02
    0.022247575 = product of:
      0.04449515 = sum of:
        0.04449515 = product of:
          0.1779806 = sum of:
            0.1779806 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1779806 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.33900294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
  2. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02
    0.017086744 = product of:
      0.03417349 = sum of:
        0.03417349 = product of:
          0.06834698 = sum of:
            0.06834698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06834698 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
  3. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011) 0.02
    0.01618799 = product of:
      0.03237598 = sum of:
        0.03237598 = product of:
          0.06475196 = sum of:
            0.06475196 = weight(_text_:w in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06475196 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.01
    0.014164492 = product of:
      0.028328983 = sum of:
        0.028328983 = product of:
          0.056657966 = sum of:
            0.056657966 = weight(_text_:w in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056657966 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Fundamental mathematical properties of rhythm sequences are studied. In particular, a set of three axioms for valid rhythm indicators is proposed, and it is shown that the R-indicator satisfies only two out of three but that the R-indicator satisfies all three. This fills a critical, logical gap in the study of these indicator sequences. Matrices leading to a constant R-sequence are called baseline matrices. They are characterized as matrices with constant w-year diachronous impact factors. The relation with classical impact factors is clarified. Using regression analysis matrices with a rhythm sequence that is on average equal to 1 (smaller than 1, larger than 1) are characterized.
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.010252046 = product of:
      0.020504093 = sum of:
        0.020504093 = product of:
          0.041008186 = sum of:
            0.041008186 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041008186 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  6. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.010252046 = product of:
      0.020504093 = sum of:
        0.020504093 = product of:
          0.041008186 = sum of:
            0.041008186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041008186 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  7. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals : taking similarity between subject fields into account (2016) 0.01
    0.0101174945 = product of:
      0.020234989 = sum of:
        0.020234989 = product of:
          0.040469978 = sum of:
            0.040469978 = weight(_text_:w in 2902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040469978 = score(doc=2902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19223882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 2902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006834698 = product of:
      0.013669396 = sum of:
        0.013669396 = product of:
          0.027338792 = sum of:
            0.027338792 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027338792 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1766523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050445713 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35