Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 0.03
    0.030242272 = product of:
      0.060484543 = sum of:
        0.060484543 = product of:
          0.12096909 = sum of:
            0.12096909 = weight(_text_:g in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12096909 = score(doc=2864,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1717903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.755558 = idf(docFreq=2823, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.7041671 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.755558 = idf(docFreq=2823, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    g-index
  2. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02
    0.015502683 = product of:
      0.031005366 = sum of:
        0.031005366 = product of:
          0.06201073 = sum of:
            0.06201073 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06201073 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.38701147 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.01
    0.010692257 = product of:
      0.021384515 = sum of:
        0.021384515 = product of:
          0.04276903 = sum of:
            0.04276903 = weight(_text_:g in 5384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04276903 = score(doc=5384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1717903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.755558 = idf(docFreq=2823, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.24896067 = fieldWeight in 5384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.755558 = idf(docFreq=2823, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Rousseau, R.; Jin, B.: ¬The age-dependent h-type AR**2-index : basic properties and a case study (2008) 0.01
    0.010692257 = product of:
      0.021384515 = sum of:
        0.021384515 = product of:
          0.04276903 = sum of:
            0.04276903 = weight(_text_:g in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04276903 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1717903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.755558 = idf(docFreq=2823, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.24896067 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.755558 = idf(docFreq=2823, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.009301609 = product of:
      0.018603219 = sum of:
        0.018603219 = product of:
          0.037206437 = sum of:
            0.037206437 = weight(_text_:22 in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037206437 = score(doc=728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.23220688 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  6. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.009301609 = product of:
      0.018603219 = sum of:
        0.018603219 = product of:
          0.037206437 = sum of:
            0.037206437 = weight(_text_:22 in 270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037206437 = score(doc=270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.23220688 = fieldWeight in 270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  7. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006201073 = product of:
      0.012402146 = sum of:
        0.012402146 = product of:
          0.024804292 = sum of:
            0.024804292 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024804292 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.04574295 = queryNorm
                0.15480459 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5028281 = idf(docFreq=3635, maxDocs=44421)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35