Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 0.03
    0.030051483 = product of:
      0.060102966 = sum of:
        0.060102966 = product of:
          0.12020593 = sum of:
            0.12020593 = weight(_text_:g in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12020593 = score(doc=1864,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    g-index
  2. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02
    0.015392908 = product of:
      0.030785816 = sum of:
        0.030785816 = product of:
          0.06157163 = sum of:
            0.06157163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06157163 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.01
    0.010624804 = product of:
      0.021249607 = sum of:
        0.021249607 = product of:
          0.042499214 = sum of:
            0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042499214 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Rousseau, R.; Jin, B.: ¬The age-dependent h-type AR**2-index : basic properties and a case study (2008) 0.01
    0.010624804 = product of:
      0.021249607 = sum of:
        0.021249607 = product of:
          0.042499214 = sum of:
            0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042499214 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.009235744 = product of:
      0.018471489 = sum of:
        0.018471489 = product of:
          0.036942977 = sum of:
            0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036942977 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  6. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.009235744 = product of:
      0.018471489 = sum of:
        0.018471489 = product of:
          0.036942977 = sum of:
            0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036942977 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  7. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006157163 = product of:
      0.012314326 = sum of:
        0.012314326 = product of:
          0.024628652 = sum of:
            0.024628652 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024628652 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35