-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.08
0.080603525 = product of:
0.16120705 = sum of:
0.16120705 = sum of:
0.09075786 = weight(_text_:l in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09075786 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.07044918 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07044918 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000)
0.06
0.058247343 = sum of:
0.031019984 = product of:
0.124079935 = sum of:
0.124079935 = weight(_text_:authors in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124079935 = score(doc=4384,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.027227357 = product of:
0.054454714 = sum of:
0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054454714 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.05
0.04836211 = product of:
0.09672422 = sum of:
0.09672422 = sum of:
0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054454714 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042269506 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.04
0.040787585 = sum of:
0.026697751 = product of:
0.106791005 = sum of:
0.106791005 = weight(_text_:authors in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106791005 = score(doc=5171,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.45050737 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014089836 = product of:
0.028179672 = sum of:
0.028179672 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028179672 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018)
0.04
0.03761396 = sum of:
0.014924496 = product of:
0.059697986 = sum of:
0.059697986 = weight(_text_:authors in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059697986 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.022689465 = product of:
0.04537893 = sum of:
0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04537893 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Aims to inform researchers about metrics so that they become aware of the evaluative techniques being applied to their scientific output. Understanding these concepts will help them during their funding initiatives, and in hiring and tenure. The book not only describes what indicators do (or are designed to do, which is not always the same thing), but also gives precise mathematical formulae so that indicators can be properly understood and evaluated. Metrics have become a critical issue in science, with widespread international discussion taking place on the subject across scientific journals and organizations. As researchers should know the publication-citation context, the mathematical formulae of indicators being used by evaluating committees and their consequences, and how such indicators might be misused, this book provides an ideal tome on the topic. Provides researchers with a detailed understanding of bibliometric indicators and their applications. Empowers researchers looking to understand the indicators relevant to their work and careers. Presents an informed and rounded picture of bibliometrics, including the strengths and shortcomings of particular indicators. Supplies the mathematics behind bibliometric indicators so they can be properly understood. Written by authors with longstanding expertise who are considered global leaders in the field of bibliometrics
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009)
0.03
0.025670199 = product of:
0.051340397 = sum of:
0.051340397 = product of:
0.102680795 = sum of:
0.102680795 = weight(_text_:l in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102680795 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.49683157 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008)
0.02
0.022461424 = product of:
0.044922847 = sum of:
0.044922847 = product of:
0.089845695 = sum of:
0.089845695 = weight(_text_:l in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089845695 = score(doc=1965,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.4347276 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Harvey, L.; Rousseau, R.: Development of text-editing skill : from semantic and syntactic mappings to procedures (1995)
0.02
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997)
0.02
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A theoretical study of recall and precision using a topological approach to information retrieval (1998)
0.02
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=3267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000)
0.02
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008)
0.02
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011)
0.02
0.018151572 = product of:
0.036303144 = sum of:
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Yan, S.; Rousseau, R.; Huang, S.: Contributions of chinese authors in PLOS ONE (2016)
0.02
0.018094992 = product of:
0.036189985 = sum of:
0.036189985 = product of:
0.14475994 = sum of:
0.14475994 = weight(_text_:authors in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14475994 = score(doc=2765,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Beginning with a short review of Public Library of Science (PLOS) journals, we focus on PLOS ONE and more specifically the contributions of Chinese authors to this journal. It is shown that their contribution is growing exponentially. In 2013 almost one fifth of all publications in this journal had at least one Chinese author. The average number of citations per publication is approximately the same for articles with a Chinese author and for articles without any Chinese coauthor. Using the odds-ratio, we could not find arguments that Chinese authors in PLOS ONE excessively cite other Chinese contributions.
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998)
0.02
0.015882626 = product of:
0.031765252 = sum of:
0.031765252 = product of:
0.063530505 = sum of:
0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063530505 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Let (DS, DQ, sim) be a retrieval system consisting of a document space DS, a query space QS, and a function sim, expressing the similarity between a document and a query. Following D.M. Everett and S.C. Cater (1992), we introduce topologies on the document space. These topologies are generated by the similarity function sim and the query space QS. 3 topologies will be studied: the retrieval topology, the similarity topology and the (pseudo-)metric one. It is shown that the retrieval topology is the coarsest of the three, while the (pseudo-)metric is the strongest. These 3 topologies are generally different, reflecting distinct topological aspects of information retrieval. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for these topological aspects to be equal
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007)
0.02
0.015882626 = product of:
0.031765252 = sum of:
0.031765252 = product of:
0.063530505 = sum of:
0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063530505 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.02
0.015882626 = product of:
0.031765252 = sum of:
0.031765252 = product of:
0.063530505 = sum of:
0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063530505 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012)
0.02
0.015882626 = product of:
0.031765252 = sum of:
0.031765252 = product of:
0.063530505 = sum of:
0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063530505 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kretschmer, H.; Rousseau, R.: Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka's law : in and out of context (2001)
0.02
0.015509992 = product of:
0.031019984 = sum of:
0.031019984 = product of:
0.124079935 = sum of:
0.124079935 = weight(_text_:authors in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124079935 = score(doc=5205,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Fractional counting of authors of multi-authored papers has been shown to lead to a breakdown of Lotka's Law despite its robust character under most circumstances. Kretschmer and Rousseau use the normal count method of full credit for each author on two five-year bibliographies from each of 13 Dutch physics institutes where high co-authorship is a common occurrence. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were preformed to see if the Lotka distribution fit the data. All bibliographies up to 40 authors fit acceptably; no bibliography with a paper with over 100 authors fits the distribution. The underlying traditional "success breeds success" mechanism assumes new items on a one by one basis, but Egghe's generalized model would still account for the process. It seems unlikely that Lotka's Law will hold in a high co-authorship environment.
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000)
0.01
0.0136136785 = product of:
0.027227357 = sum of:
0.027227357 = product of:
0.054454714 = sum of:
0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054454714 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
