Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ruge, G."
  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Ruge, G.; Goeser, S.: Information Retrieval ohne Linguistik (1998) 0.00 
    0.0020293817 = product of:
  0.02333789 = sum of:
    0.010853632 = weight(_text_:und in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010853632 = score(doc=2528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
    0.012484257 = weight(_text_:im in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012484257 = score(doc=2528,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    Natürlicherweise sollte man erwarten, daß linguistische Textanalyseverfahren die Effektivität und Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Information Retrieval Systemen verbessern, da sowohl Dokumente als auch Suchanfragen die interessierenden Inhalte linguistisch enkodieren. Ein Retrievalabgleich auf der Ebene der linguistischen Inhaltsdarstellung müßte demzufolge zu besseren Retrievalsystemen führen als ein Abgleich auf Wort- oder gar Zeichenebene. Tatsächlich aber ist immer noch weitgehend unklar, inwieweit linguistische Textanalyseverfahren Retrievalsysteme verbessern können. Evaluationen von Retrievalsystemen mit linguistischen Komponenten führen nach wie vor zu unterschiedlichen, teils gegenläufigen Ergebnissen, obwohl die dazu erforderliche Computerlinguistik große Fortschritte gemacht hat. Wir gehen der Frage nach, wie es zu diesen kontraintuitiven Ergenissen kommt. Dazu wird der Stand der Kunst im linguistischen IR zusammengefaßt, so daß die Ergebnisse anhand des Vergleich verschiedener Evaluierungen diskutiert werden können.
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.6, S.361-369
  2. Ruge, G.; Schwarz, C.: Term association and computational linguistics (1991) 0.00 
    0.0019430243 = product of:
  0.02234478 = sum of:
    0.007856515 = product of:
      0.01571303 = sum of:
        0.01571303 = weight(_text_:1 in 2310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01571303 = score(doc=2310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 2310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2310)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014488265 = product of:
      0.02897653 = sum of:
        0.02897653 = weight(_text_:international in 2310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02897653 = score(doc=2310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.36856616 = fieldWeight in 2310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2310)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Source
    International classification. 18(1991) no.1, S.19-25
  3. Ruge, G.; Schwarz, C.: Linguistically based term associations : a new semantic component for a hyperterm system (1990) 0.00 
    0.0017808038 = product of:
  0.020479243 = sum of:
    0.008888633 = product of:
      0.017777266 = sum of:
        0.017777266 = weight(_text_:1 in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017777266 = score(doc=5544,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011590611 = product of:
      0.023181222 = sum of:
        0.023181222 = weight(_text_:international in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023181222 = score(doc=5544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2948529 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.1
    Source
    Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface. Proceedings of the 1st International ISKO Conference, Darmstadt, 14.-17.8.1990. Pt.1
  4. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.00 
    9.7181974E-4 = product of:
  0.022351854 = sum of:
    0.022351854 = product of:
      0.044703707 = sum of:
        0.044703707 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044703707 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22

Authors

Languages