-
Sanderson, M.; Ruthven, I.: Report on the Glasgow IR group (glair4) submission (1997)
0.04
0.035844397 = product of:
0.14337759 = sum of:
0.14337759 = weight(_text_:standards in 3088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14337759 = score(doc=3088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24263687 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.054440062 = queryNorm
0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 3088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3088)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
-
Crestani, F.; Ruthven, I.; Sanderson, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The troubles with using a logical model of IR on a large collection of documents : experimenting retrieval by logical imaging on TREC (1996)
0.03
0.029870331 = product of:
0.119481325 = sum of:
0.119481325 = weight(_text_:standards in 7522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119481325 = score(doc=7522,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24263687 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.054440062 = queryNorm
0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 7522, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7522)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
-
Lalmas, M.; Ruthven, I.: ¬A model for structured document retrieval : empirical investigations (1997)
0.01
0.005242753 = product of:
0.020971011 = sum of:
0.020971011 = weight(_text_:information in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020971011 = score(doc=727,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.054440062 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Documents often display a structure, e.g. several sections, each with several subsections and so on. Taking into account the structure of a document allows the retrieval process to focus on those parts of the document that are most relevant to an information need. In previous work, we developed a model for the representation and the retrieval of structured documents. This paper reports the first experimental study of the effectiveness and applicability of the model
- Source
- Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a
-
Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.: Selective relevance feedback using term characteristics (1999)
0.00
0.0046339827 = product of:
0.01853593 = sum of:
0.01853593 = weight(_text_:information in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01853593 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.054440062 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Vocabulary as a central concept in digital libraries: interdisciplinary concepts, challenges, and opportunities : proceedings of the Third International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Science (COLIS3), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999. Ed. by T. Arpanac et al