Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ruthven, I."
  1. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.05
    0.04884439 = product of:
      0.09768878 = sum of:
        0.09768878 = sum of:
          0.057150226 = weight(_text_:56 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057150226 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24881299 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059841596 = queryNorm
              0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.040538553 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040538553 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20955507 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.059841596 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  2. Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.: Selective relevance feedback using term characteristics (1999) 0.03
    0.028575113 = product of:
      0.057150226 = sum of:
        0.057150226 = product of:
          0.11430045 = sum of:
            0.11430045 = weight(_text_:56 in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11430045 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24881299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059841596 = queryNorm
                0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 8.2005 13:47:56
  3. Ruthven, I.: Integrating approaches to relevance (2005) 0.02
    0.018074362 = product of:
      0.036148723 = sum of:
        0.036148723 = product of:
          0.108446166 = sum of:
            0.108446166 = weight(_text_:seeks in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108446166 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3832006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059841596 = queryNorm
                0.28300104 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance is the distinguishing feature of IR research. It is the intricacy of relevance, and its basis in human decision-making, which defines and shapes our research field. Relevance as a concept cuts across the spectrum of information seeking and IR research from investigations into information seeking behaviours to theoretical models of IR. Given their mutual dependence on relevance we might predict a strong relationship between information seeking and retrieval in how they regard and discuss the role of relevance within our research programmes. However often, too often, information seeking and IR have been continued as independent research traditions: IR research ignoring the extensive, user-based frameworks developed by information seeking and information seeking underestimating the influence of IR systems and interfaces within the information seeking process. When these two disciplines come together we often find the strongest research, research that is motivated by an understanding of what cognitive processes require support during information seeking, and an understanding of how this support might be provided by an IR system. The aim of this chapter is to investigate this common ground of research, in particular to examine the central notion of relevance that underpins both information seeking and IR research. It seeks to investigate how our understanding of relevance as a process of human decision making can, and might, influence our design of interactive IR systems. It does not cover every area of IR research, or each area in the same depth; rather we try to single out the areas where the nature of relevance, and its implications, is driving the research agenda. We start by providing a brief introduction to how relevance has been treated so far in the literature and then consider the key areas where issues of relevance are of current concern. Specifically the chapter discusses the difficulties of making and interpreting relevance assessments, the role and meaning of differentiated relevance assessments, the specific role of time within information seeking, and the large, complex issue of relevance within evaluations of IR systems. In each area we try to establish where the two fields of IR and information seeking are establishing fruitful collaborations, where there is a gap for prospective collaboration and the possible difficulties in establishing mutual aims.
  4. Tombros, A.; Ruthven, I.; Jose, J.M.: How users assess Web pages for information seeking (2005) 0.02
    0.017145067 = product of:
      0.034290135 = sum of:
        0.034290135 = product of:
          0.06858027 = sum of:
            0.06858027 = weight(_text_:56 in 5255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06858027 = score(doc=5255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24881299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059841596 = queryNorm
                0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 5255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.327-344
  5. White, R.W.; Jose, J.M.; Ruthven, I.: Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access (2005) 0.01
    0.0142875565 = product of:
      0.028575113 = sum of:
        0.028575113 = product of:
          0.057150226 = sum of:
            0.057150226 = weight(_text_:56 in 3881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057150226 = score(doc=3881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24881299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059841596 = queryNorm
                0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 3881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.10, S.1113-1125
  6. Ruthven, I.: ¬The language of information need : differentiating conscious and formalized information needs (2019) 0.01
    0.0142875565 = product of:
      0.028575113 = sum of:
        0.028575113 = product of:
          0.057150226 = sum of:
            0.057150226 = weight(_text_:56 in 5035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057150226 = score(doc=5035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24881299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059841596 = queryNorm
                0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 5035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 56(2019) no.1, S.77-90