Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sünkler, S."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016) 0.15 
    0.15173718 = product of:
  0.20231625 = sum of:
    0.050382458 = weight(_text_:web in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050382458 = score(doc=3144,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
    0.07377557 = weight(_text_:search in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07377557 = score(doc=3144,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.4293381 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
    0.07815824 = product of:
      0.15631647 = sum of:
        0.15631647 = weight(_text_:engine in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15631647 = score(doc=3144,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.26447627 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.59104156 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Users of web search engines are known to mostly focus on the top ranked results of the search engine result page. While many studies support this well known information seeking pattern only few studies concentrate on the question what users are missing by neglecting lower ranked results. To learn more about the relevance distributions in the so-called long tail we conducted a relevance assessment study with the Million Short long-tail web search engine. While we see a clear difference in the content between the head and the tail of the search engine result list we see no statistical significant differences in the binary relevance judgments and weak significant differences when using graded relevance. The tail contains different but still valuable results. We argue that the long tail can be a rich source for the diversification of web search engine result lists but it needs more evaluation to clearly describe the differences.
  2. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.12 
    0.11565834 = product of:
  0.23131669 = sum of:
    0.08729243 = weight(_text_:search in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08729243 = score(doc=5288,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.5079997 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.14402425 = sum of:
      0.11053244 = weight(_text_:engine in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11053244 = score(doc=5288,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26447627 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049439456 = queryNorm
          0.41792953 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
      0.03349182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03349182 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049439456 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Lewandowski, D.; Kerkmann, F.; Rümmele, S.; Sünkler, S.: ¬An empirical investigation on search engine ad disclosure (2018) 0.07 
    0.07134819 = product of:
  0.14269638 = sum of:
    0.06532367 = weight(_text_:search in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06532367 = score(doc=4115,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.38015217 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
    0.07737271 = product of:
      0.15474541 = sum of:
        0.15474541 = weight(_text_:engine in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15474541 = score(doc=4115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26447627 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.5851013 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This representative study of German search engine users (N?=?1,000) focuses on the ability of users to distinguish between organic results and advertisements on Google results pages. We combine questions about Google's business with task-based studies in which users were asked to distinguish between ads and organic results in screenshots of results pages. We find that only a small percentage of users can reliably distinguish between ads and organic results, and that user knowledge of Google's business model is very limited. We conclude that ads are insufficiently labelled as such, and that many users may click on ads assuming that they are selecting organic results.
  4. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.; Kerkmann, F.: Are ads on Google search engine results pages labeled clearly enough? : the influence of knowledge on search ads on users' selection behaviour (2017) 0.07 
    0.066836946 = product of:
  0.13367389 = sum of:
    0.06598687 = weight(_text_:search in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598687 = score(doc=3567,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
    0.06768702 = product of:
      0.13537404 = sum of:
        0.13537404 = weight(_text_:engine in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13537404 = score(doc=3567,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.26447627 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.51185703 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In an online experiment using a representative sample of the German online population (n = 1.000), we compare users' selection behaviour on two versions of the same Google search engine results page (SERP), one showing advertisements and organic results, the other showing organic results only. Selection behaviour is analyzed in relation to users' knowledge on Google's business model, on SERP design, and on these users' actual performance in marking advertisements on SERPs correctly. We find that users who were not able to mark ads correctly selected ads significantly more often. This leads to the conclusion that ads need to be labeled more clearly, and that there is a need for more information literacy in search engine users.
  5. Sünkler, S.; Kerkmann, F.; Schultheiß, S.: Ok Google . the end of search as we know it : sprachgesteuerte Websuche im Test (2018) 0.05 
    0.053023666 = product of:
  0.10604733 = sum of:
    0.04072366 = weight(_text_:web in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04072366 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
    0.06532367 = weight(_text_:search in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06532367 = score(doc=5626,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.38015217 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Sprachsteuerungssysteme, die den Nutzer auf Zuruf unterstützen, werden im Zuge der Verbreitung von Smartphones und Lautsprechersystemen wie Amazon Echo oder Google Home zunehmend populär. Eine der zentralen Anwendungen dabei stellt die Suche in Websuchmaschinen dar. Wie aber funktioniert "googlen", wenn der Nutzer seine Suchanfrage nicht schreibt, sondern spricht? Dieser Frage ist ein Projektteam der HAW Hamburg nachgegangen und hat im Auftrag der Deutschen Telekom untersucht, wie effektiv, effizient und zufriedenstellend Google Now, Apple Siri, Microsoft Cortana sowie das Amazon Fire OS arbeiten. Ermittelt wurden Stärken und Schwächen der Systeme sowie Erfolgskriterien für eine hohe Gebrauchstauglichkeit. Diese Erkenntnisse mündeten in dem Prototyp einer optimalen Voice Web Search.
  6. Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: ¬Das Relevance Assessment Tool : eine modulare Software zur Unterstützung bei der Durchführung vielfältiger Studien mit Suchmaschinen (2019) 0.01 
    0.012341131 = product of:
  0.049364526 = sum of:
    0.049364526 = weight(_text_:web in 5026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049364526 = score(doc=5026,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 5026, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5026)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel stellen wir eine Software vor, mit der sich Studien zu Such- und Informationssystemen realisieren lassen. Das Relevance Assessment Tool (RAT) soll umfangreiche Untersuchungen mit Daten von kommerziellen Suchmaschinen unterstützen. Die Software ist modular und webbasiert. Es lassen sich damit automatisiert Daten von Suchmaschinen erfassen. Dazu können Studien mit Fragen und Skalen flexibel gestaltet und die Informationsobjekte anhand der Fragen durch Juroren bewertet werden. Durch die Modularität lassen sich die einzelnen Komponenten für eine Vielzahl von Studien nutzen, die sich auf Web-Inhalte beziehen. So kann die Software auch für qualitative Inhaltsanalysen eingesetzt werden oder durch das automatisierte Scraping eine große Datenbasis an Web-Dokumenten liefern, die sich quantitativ in empirischen Studien analysieren lassen.
  7. Kerkmann, F.; Sünkler, S.; Schultheiß, S.: ¬Die Suche nach dem "Wie..." : Tutorials als Gegenstand der Suche (2017) 0.01 
    0.008726497 = product of:
  0.03490599 = sum of:
    0.03490599 = weight(_text_:web in 3550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03490599 = score(doc=3550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3550)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Anleitungen zu verschiedensten Themen, sogenannte Tutorials, erleben seit einiger Zeit einen regelrechten Boom im Web. Immer mehr Angebote werden online gestellt; entsprechend steigt auch der Bedarf an geeigneten Plattformen und Suchinstrumenten, um diese Vielzahl für den Nutzer zu bündeln und durchsuchbar zu machen. Der Beitrag nähert sich dem bislang wenig beachteten Phänomen Tutorial und der Suche nach diesem speziellen Format an. Beleuchtet werden die verschiedenen Begriffsverständnisse der Bezeichnung 'Tutorial' ebenso wie die gesellschaftlichen Treiber, die für den zunehmenden Trend, Tutorials zu produzieren und zu rezipieren sorgen. Derzeit existierende Spezialsuchmaschinen als eine Möglichkeit der Suche nach Tutorials werden in einer Marktsichtung zusammengetragen und mit ihren jeweiligen Stärken und Schwächen beschrieben. Die Erkenntnisse daraus münden in den Anforderungen an eine optimierte Suchlösung für diesen Anwendungszweck und ihre beispielhafte Umsetzung.
  8. Lewandowski, D.; Krewinkel, A.; Gleissner, M.; Osterode, D.; Tolg, B.; Holle, M.; Sünkler, S.: Entwicklung und Anwendung einer Software zur automatisierten Kontrolle des Lebensmittelmarktes im Internet mit informationswissenschaftlichen Methoden (2019) 0.01 
    0.008726497 = product of:
  0.03490599 = sum of:
    0.03490599 = weight(_text_:web in 5025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03490599 = score(doc=5025,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049439456 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5025, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5025)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel präsentieren wir die Durchführung und die Ergebnisse eines interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekts zum Thema automatisierte Lebensmittelkontrolle im Web. Es wurden Kompetenzen aus den Disziplinen Lebensmittelwissenschaft, Rechtswissenschaft, Informationswissenschaft und Informatik dazu genutzt, ein detailliertes Konzept und einen Software-Prototypen zu entwickeln, um das Internet nach Produktangeboten zu durchsuchen, die gegen das Lebensmittelrecht verstoßen. Dabei wird deutlich, wie ein solcher Anwendungsfall von den Methoden der Information-Retrieval-Evaluierung profitiert, und wie sich mit relativ geringem Aufwand eine flexible Software programmieren lässt, die auch für eine Vielzahl anderer Fragestellungen einsetzbar ist. Die Ergebnisse des Projekts zeigen, wie komplexe Arbeitsprozesse einer Behörde mit Hilfe der Methoden von Retrieval-Tests und gängigen Verfahren aus dem maschinellen Lernen effektiv und effizient unterstützt werden können.

Authors

Languages

Themes