Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Saarti, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002) 0.00 
    0.0045768693 = product of:
  0.032038085 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the consistency of fiction indexing of library professionals and patrons based on an empirical test. Indexing was carried out with a Finnish fictional thesaurus and all of the test persons indexed the same five novels. The consistency of indexing was determined to be low; several reasons are postulated. Also an algorithm for typified indexing of fiction is given as well as some suggestions for the development of fiction information retrieval systems and content representation.
  2. Saarti, J.: Taxonomy of novel abstracts : based on empirical findings (2000) 0.00 
    0.0014978976 = product of:
  0.020970564 = sum of:
    0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020970564 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    This paper examines the content description of fictional works, specifically novels. The data for the empirical part of the study was gathered in Finnish public libraries. The aim of the study is to find out how library clients and library professionals of public libraries describe novels by abstracting them - what are differences in their characterisations and what are the similarities between their abstracts. Also, a taxonomy of novel abstracts is given. The abstracts are classified into four categories in the taxonomy: plot or thematic abstracts, cultural-historical abstracts, subjective or personal abstracts and critical abstracts. In the final portion of the paper, a model for a search and retrieval system for fiction is presented.
  3. Saarti, J.: ¬The analysis of the information process of fiction : a holistic approach to information processing (2003) 0.00 
    0.0011280583 = product of:
  0.015792815 = sum of:
    0.015792815 = weight(_text_:information in 2683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015792815 = score(doc=2683,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 2683, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2683)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    The objective of the paper is to analyse the information (communication) process of fiction in order to increase our understanding of the different actors and factors involved in information processing. The methodology is that of the grounded theory, where previous studies of information process and fiction content representation are compared with the results of an empirical study in which library patrons and library professionals were asked to index and abstract five different kinds of novels.