-
Ward, M.; Saarti, J.: Reviewing, rebutting, and reimagining fiction classification (2018)
0.02
0.018470693 = product of:
0.05541208 = sum of:
0.05541208 = product of:
0.11082416 = sum of:
0.11082416 = weight(_text_:classification in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11082416 = score(doc=5164,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article explores the topic of fiction classification. The first section attempts to define the field, discussing fiction classification, its schemes, objectivity, aboutness, and shelf classification. The second section suggests three new ideas building upon the foundation of the first: a faceted multi-warrant classification, controlled term affective dimension searching, and the design of a user-oriented recommendation-based system.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.4, S.317-329
-
Saarti, J.: Fictional literature : classification and indexing (2019)
0.01
0.011544183 = product of:
0.03463255 = sum of:
0.03463255 = product of:
0.0692651 = sum of:
0.0692651 = weight(_text_:classification in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0692651 = score(doc=5315,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.43094325 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Fiction content analysis and retrieval are interesting specific topics for two major reasons: 1) the extensive use of fictional works; and, 2) the multimodality and interpretational nature of fiction. The primary challenge in the analysis of fictional content is that there is no single meaning to be analysed; the analysis is an ongoing process involving an interaction between the text produced by author, the reader and the society in which the interaction occurs. Furthermore, different audiences have specific needs to be taken into consideration. This article explores the topic of fiction knowledge organization, including both classification and indexing. It provides a broad and analytical overview of the literature as well as describing several experimental approaches and developmental projects for the analysis of fictional content. Traditional fiction indexing has been mainly based on the factual aspects of the work; this has then been expanded to handle different aspects of the fictional work. There have been attempts made to develop vocabularies for fiction indexing. All the major classification schemes use the genre and language/culture of fictional works when subdividing fictional works into subclasses. The evolution of shelf classification of fiction and the appearance of different types of digital tools have revolutionized the classification of fiction, making it possible to integrate both indexing and classification of fictional works.
-
Saarti, J.: Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction (1997)
0.01
0.009331052 = product of:
0.027993156 = sum of:
0.027993156 = product of:
0.05598631 = sum of:
0.05598631 = weight(_text_:classification in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05598631 = score(doc=1745,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Investigates what effect the shelf classification of fiction had on the way that library users in the 2 branch libraries of Kajanni, Finland, use the library's stock of fiction and how they loan fiction. In 1 library the fiction stock was divided in 11 shelf categories, based on genres of fiction - in the other no changes were made. The books were also indexed and classified in the library's database. The project lasted for 3 years and the results were gathered by interviewing clients and making statistical analysis on loans in both libraries
-
Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992)
0.01
0.009117142 = product of:
0.027351426 = sum of:
0.027351426 = product of:
0.054702852 = sum of:
0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054702852 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
-
Saarti, J.: Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri (1999)
0.01
0.0079775 = product of:
0.023932498 = sum of:
0.023932498 = product of:
0.047864996 = sum of:
0.047864996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047864996 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
