Saif, H.; He, Y.; Fernandez, M.; Alani, H.: Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter (2016)
0.01
0.0053924047 = product of:
0.03774683 = sum of:
0.03262541 = weight(_text_:wide in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03262541 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13329163 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.030083254 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
0.005121422 = weight(_text_:information in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005121422 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052810486 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.030083254 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Sentiment analysis on Twitter has attracted much attention recently due to its wide applications in both, commercial and public sectors. In this paper we present SentiCircles, a lexicon-based approach for sentiment analysis on Twitter. Different from typical lexicon-based approaches, which offer a fixed and static prior sentiment polarities of words regardless of their context, SentiCircles takes into account the co-occurrence patterns of words in different contexts in tweets to capture their semantics and update their pre-assigned strength and polarity in sentiment lexicons accordingly. Our approach allows for the detection of sentiment at both entity-level and tweet-level. We evaluate our proposed approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons to derive word prior sentiments. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms the baselines in accuracy and F-measure for entity-level subjectivity (neutral vs. polar) and polarity (positive vs. negative) detections. For tweet-level sentiment detection, our approach performs better than the state-of-the-art SentiStrength by 4-5% in accuracy in two datasets, but falls marginally behind by 1% in F-measure in the third dataset.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.5-19