Search (49 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Salton, G."
  1. Salton, G.: Expert systems and information retrieval (1987) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    SIGIR forum. 21(1987) no.3/4, S.3-9
    Type
    a
  2. Salton, G.: Historical note: the past thirty years in information retrieval (1987) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=3910,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=3910,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 38(1987) no.5, S.375-380
    Type
    a
  3. Salton, G.; Fox, E.A.; Voorhees, E.: Advanced feedback methods in information retrieval (1985) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=5445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5445)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=5445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5445)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36(1985), S.200-210
    Type
    a
  4. Salton, G.; Yang, C.S.: On the specification of term values in automatic indexing (1973) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=5476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=5476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973), S.351-372
    Type
    a
  5. Salton, G.; Waldstein, R.H.: Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval (1978) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 14(1978), S.20-35
    Type
    a
  6. Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.: Effective information retrieval using term accuracy (1971) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 20(1971), S.135-142
    Type
    a
  7. Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.: Precision weighting : an effective automatic indexing method (1976) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 23(1976), S.76-88
    Type
    a
  8. Salton, G.: Automated language processing (1968) 0.00 
    0.002146068 = product of:
  0.011803374 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=233)
    0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055552567 = score(doc=233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=233)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.137-168
    Type
    a
  9. Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.; Siu, M.K.: Effective automatic indexing using term addition and deletion (1978) 0.00 
    0.0018778095 = product of:
  0.010327952 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=2859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
    0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048608496 = score(doc=2859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 25(1978), S.210-225
    Type
    a
  10. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.; Smith, M.: On the application of syntactic methodologies in automatic text analysis (1990) 0.00 
    0.0018778095 = product of:
  0.010327952 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 7864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=7864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7864)
    0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 7864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048608496 = score(doc=7864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7864)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990) no.1, S.73-92
    Type
    a
  11. Salton, G.: ¬A note about information science research (1997) 0.00 
    0.0018502322 = product of:
  0.010176277 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=582,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
    0.00392816 = weight(_text_:s in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00392816 = score(doc=582,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck aus: JASIS 36(1985) no.4, S.268-271
    Pages
    S.131-136
    Source
    From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
    Type
    a
  12. Salton, G.: Fast document classification in automatic information retrieval (1978) 0.00 
    0.0016410447 = product of:
  0.009025746 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=2331,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    A classified or clustered file is one where related or similar records are grouped into classes or clusters of items in such a way that all itmes within a cluster are jointly retrievable. Clustered files are easily adapted to to broad and narrow search strategies, and simple file updating methods are available. An inexpensive file clustering method applicable to large files is given together with appropriate file search methods
    Pages
    S.129-146
    Type
    a
  13. Salton, G.: Automatic text structuring and summarization (1997) 0.00 
    0.0015532422 = product of:
  0.008542832 = sum of:
    0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006112407 = score(doc=145,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Applies the ideas from the automatic link generation research to automatic text summarisation. Using techniques for inter-document link generation, generates intra-document links between passages of a document. Based on the intra-document linkage pattern of a text, characterises the structure of the text. Applies the knowledge of text structure to do automatic text summarisation by passage extraction. Evaluates a set of 50 summaries generated using these techniques by comparing the to paragraph extracts constructed by humans. The automatic summarisation methods perform well, especially in view of the fact that the summaries generates by 2 humans for the same article are surprisingly dissimilar
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue on methods and tools for the automatic construction of hypertext
    Source
    Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.2, S.193-207
    Type
    a
  14. Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969) 0.00 
    0.0014359142 = product of:
  0.007897528 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=4151,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=4151,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Two widerly used criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems are, respectively, the recall and the precision. Since the determiniation of these measures is dependent on a distinction between documents which are relevant to a given query and documents which are not relevant to that query, it has sometimes been claimed that an accurate, generally valid evaluation cannot be based on recall and precision measure. A study was made to determine the effect of variations in relevance assesments do not produce significant variations in average recall and precision. It thus appears that properly computed recall and precision data may represent effectiveness indicators which are gemerally valid for many distinct user classes.
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 4(1969), S.343-359
    Type
    a
  15. Salton, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents (1985) 0.00 
    0.0013811013 = product of:
  0.007596057 = sum of:
    0.005631977 = weight(_text_:a in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005631977 = score(doc=3650,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18373153 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
    0.00196408 = weight(_text_:s in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00196408 = score(doc=3650,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The attempt to computerize a process, such as indexing, abstracting, classifying, or retrieving information, begins with an analysis of the process into its intellectual and nonintellectual components. That part of the process which is amenable to computerization is mechanical or algorithmic. What is not is intellectual or creative and requires human intervention. Gerard Salton has been an innovator, experimenter, and promoter in the area of mechanized information systems since the early 1960s. He has been particularly ingenious at analyzing the process of information retrieval into its algorithmic components. He received a doctorate in applied mathematics from Harvard University before moving to the computer science department at Cornell, where he developed a prototype automatic retrieval system called SMART. Working with this system he and his students contributed for over a decade to our theoretical understanding of the retrieval process. On a more practical level, they have contributed design criteria for operating retrieval systems. The following selection presents one of the early descriptions of the SMART system; it is valuable as it shows the direction automatic retrieval methods were to take beyond simple word-matching techniques. These include various word normalization techniques to improve recall, for instance, the separation of words into stems and affixes; the correlation and clustering, using statistical association measures, of related terms; and the identification, using a concept thesaurus, of synonymous, broader, narrower, and sibling terms. They include, as weIl, techniques, both linguistic and statistical, to deal with the thorny problem of how to automatically extract from texts index terms that consist of more than one word. They include weighting techniques and various documentrequest matching algorithms. Significant among the latter are those which produce a retrieval output of citations ranked in relevante order. During the 1970s, Salton and his students went an to further refine these various techniques, particularly the weighting and statistical association measures. Many of their early innovations seem commonplace today. Some of their later techniques are still ahead of their time and await technological developments for implementation. The particular focus of the selection that follows is an the evaluation of a particular component of the SMART system, a multilingual thesaurus. By mapping English language expressions and their German equivalents to a common concept number, the thesaurus permitted the automatic processing of German language documents against English language queries and vice versa. The results of the evaluation, as it turned out, were somewhat inconclusive. However, this SMART experiment suggested in a bold and optimistic way how one might proceed to answer such complex questions as What is meant by retrieval language compatability? How it is to be achieved, and how evaluated?
    Footnote
    Original in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 21(1970) no.3, S.187-194.
    Pages
    S.340-355
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
    Type
    a
  16. Wong, S.K.M.; Yao, Y.Y.; Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Evaluation of an adaptive linear model (1991) 0.00 
    0.0013083118 = product of:
  0.007195715 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=4836,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Reports on the experimental evaluation of an adaptive linear model that constructs improved user query vectors from user preference judgements on a sample set of documents. The performance of this method is compared with that of the standard relevance feedback techniques. The experimental results seem to demonstrate the effectiveness of the adaptive method
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991) no.10, S.723-730
    Type
    a
  17. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.; Allan, J.: Automatic structuring of text files (1992) 0.00 
    0.0013083118 = product of:
  0.007195715 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 6507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=6507,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6507, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6507)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 6507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=6507,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6507, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6507)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    In many practical information retrieval situations, it is necessary to process heterogeneous text databases that vary greatly in scope and coverage and deal with many different subjects. In such an environment it is important to provide flexible access to individual text pieces and to structure the collection so that related text elements are identified and properly linked. Describes methods for the automatic structuring of heterogeneous text collections and the construction of browsing tools and access procedures that facilitate collection use. Illustrates these emthods with searches using a large automated encyclopedia
    Source
    Electronic publishing. 5(1992) no.1, S.1-17
    Type
    a
  18. Salton, G.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van; Maron, M.E.: Panel on key issues in information retrieval (1983) 0.00 
    0.0013083118 = product of:
  0.007195715 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=7410,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue devoted to the 6th Annual International Conference of the Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval of the Association for Computing Machinery (USA) held at the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, from 6-8 June 83. The following papers were presented in session 12 which was a panel on key issues in information retrieval: SALTON, G.: Research problems in automatic information retrieval; RIJSBERGEN, C.J. van: Information retrieval: new directions, old solutions; MARON, M.E.: Open problems in information retrieval
    Source
    SIGIR forum. 17(1983) no.4, S.251-267
    Type
    a
  19. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Singhal, A.: Automatic text decomposition and structuring (1996) 0.00 
    0.0013083118 = product of:
  0.007195715 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=4067,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=4067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.127-138
    Type
    a
  20. Salton, G.: SMART System: 1961-1976 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0013083118 = product of:
  0.007195715 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 3879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=3879,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3879, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3879)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=3879,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3879, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3879)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    While a number of researchers had experimented during the 1950's on automatic indexing and retrieval in various forms, it was Gerard Salton who brought the information retrieval experimental paradigm to full fruition, with his "SMART" system. His work has been enormously influential.
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 44
  • m 4
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes