-
Lee, W.M.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing URL queries (2010)
0.01
0.010264986 = product of:
0.05132493 = sum of:
0.05132493 = weight(_text_:7 in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05132493 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This study investigated a relatively unexamined query type, queries composed of URLs. The extent, variation, and user click-through behavior was examined to determine the intent behind URL queries. The study made use of a search log from which URL queries were identified and selected for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. It was found that URL queries accounted for ?17% of the sample. There were statistically significant differences between URL queries and non-URL queries in the following attributes: mean query length; mean number of tokens per query; and mean number of clicks per query. Users issuing such queries clicked on fewer result list items higher up the ranking compared to non-URL queries. Classification indicated that nearly 86% of queries were navigational in intent with informational and transactional queries representing about 7% of URL queries each. This is in contrast to past research that suggested that URL queries were 100% navigational. The conclusions of this study are that URL queries are relatively common and that simply returning the page that matches a user's URL is not an optimal strategy.
-
Aldosari, M.; Sanderson, M.; Tam, A.; Uitdenbogerd, A.L.: Understanding collaborative search for places of interest (2016)
0.01
0.010264986 = product of:
0.05132493 = sum of:
0.05132493 = weight(_text_:7 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05132493 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 13:09:59
-
Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014)
0.01
0.0095583955 = product of:
0.047791976 = sum of:
0.047791976 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047791976 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24705005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26. 1.2014 18:48:22
-
Yulianti, E.; Huspi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Tweet-biased summarization (2016)
0.01
0.008554155 = product of:
0.042770773 = sum of:
0.042770773 = weight(_text_:7 in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042770773 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.07054885 = queryNorm
0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 13:03:40