Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

Tavakoli, L.; Zamani, H.; Scholer, F.; Croft, W.B.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing clarification in asynchronous information-seeking conversations (2022) 0.01

0.012086797 = product of:
  0.06043398 = sum of:
    0.06043398 = sum of:
      0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0169787 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
      0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04345528 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Sanderson, M.; Ruthven, I.: Report on the Glasgow IR group (glair4) submission (1997) 0.01

0.011797213 = product of:
  0.058986064 = sum of:
    0.058986064 = weight(_text_:u in 3088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058986064 = score(doc=3088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3088)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman

Lee, W.M.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing URL queries (2010) 0.01

0.009761425 = product of:
  0.04880712 = sum of:
    0.04880712 = product of:
      0.09761424 = sum of:
        0.09761424 = weight(_text_:lee in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09761424 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.3949033 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Sanderson, M.; Lawrie, D.: Building, testing, and applying concept hierarchies (2000) 0.01

0.0058986065 = product of:
  0.029493032 = sum of:
    0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029493032 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Theme: Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.00

0.004497519 = product of:
  0.022487596 = sum of:
    0.022487596 = product of:
      0.04497519 = sum of:
        0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04497519 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Spina, D.; Trippas, J.R.; Cavedon, L.; Sanderson, M.: Extracting audio summaries to support effective spoken document search (2017) 0.00

0.0043455283 = product of:
  0.02172764 = sum of:
    0.02172764 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345528 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008) 0.00
```
0.0037965532 = product of:
  0.018982766 = sum of:
    0.018982766 = product of:
      0.037965532 = sum of:
        0.037965532 = weight(_text_:h in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037965532 = score(doc=1867,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.3682743 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

A brief communication appearing in this journal ranked UK-based LIS and (some) IR academics by their h-index using data derived from the Thomson ISI Web of Science(TM) (WoS). In this brief communication, the same academics were re-ranked, using other popular citation databases. It was found that for academics who publish more in computer science forums, their h was significantly different due to highly cited papers missed by WoS; consequently, their rank changed substantially. The study was widened to a broader set of UK-based LIS and IR academics in which results showed similar statistically significant differences. A variant of h, hmx, was introduced that allowed a ranking of the academics using all citation databases together.

Object

h-index

Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.00

0.0028109495 = product of:
  0.014054747 = sum of:
    0.014054747 = product of:
      0.028109495 = sum of:
        0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028109495 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 26. 1.2014 18:48:22

Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes