Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sanderson, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008) 0.02 
    0.020114698 = product of:
  0.040229395 = sum of:
    0.040229395 = product of:
      0.060344093 = sum of:
        0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018688826 = score(doc=1867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04552693 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
        0.041655265 = weight(_text_:h in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041655265 = score(doc=1867,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04552693 = queryNorm
            0.3682743 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A brief communication appearing in this journal ranked UK-based LIS and (some) IR academics by their h-index using data derived from the Thomson ISI Web of Science(TM) (WoS). In this brief communication, the same academics were re-ranked, using other popular citation databases. It was found that for academics who publish more in computer science forums, their h was significantly different due to highly cited papers missed by WoS; consequently, their rank changed substantially. The study was widened to a broader set of UK-based LIS and IR academics in which results showed similar statistically significant differences. A variant of h, hmx, was introduced that allowed a ranking of the academics using all citation databases together.
    Object
    h-index
  2. Vrettas, G.; Sanderson, M.: Conferences versus journals in computer science (2015) 0.00 
    0.0031148044 = product of:
  0.006229609 = sum of:
    0.006229609 = product of:
      0.018688826 = sum of:
        0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018688826 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04552693 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Years