-
Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996)
0.01
0.012416481 = product of:
0.024832962 = sum of:
0.024832962 = product of:
0.049665924 = sum of:
0.049665924 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049665924 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008)
0.01
0.010481297 = product of:
0.020962594 = sum of:
0.020962594 = product of:
0.04192519 = sum of:
0.04192519 = weight(_text_:h in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04192519 = score(doc=1867,freq=10.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.3682743 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A brief communication appearing in this journal ranked UK-based LIS and (some) IR academics by their h-index using data derived from the Thomson ISI Web of Science(TM) (WoS). In this brief communication, the same academics were re-ranked, using other popular citation databases. It was found that for academics who publish more in computer science forums, their h was significantly different due to highly cited papers missed by WoS; consequently, their rank changed substantially. The study was widened to a broader set of UK-based LIS and IR academics in which results showed similar statistically significant differences. A variant of h, hmx, was introduced that allowed a ranking of the academics using all citation databases together.
- Object
- h-index
-
Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014)
0.01
0.0077603008 = product of:
0.0155206015 = sum of:
0.0155206015 = product of:
0.031041203 = sum of:
0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031041203 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 1.2014 18:48:22
-
Tavakoli, L.; Zamani, H.; Scholer, F.; Croft, W.B.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing clarification in asynchronous information-seeking conversations (2022)
0.00
0.004687378 = product of:
0.009374756 = sum of:
0.009374756 = product of:
0.018749513 = sum of:
0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018749513 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)