Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sanderson, M."
  1. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.014144942 = product of:
      0.028289884 = sum of:
        0.028289884 = product of:
          0.05657977 = sum of:
            0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05657977 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  2. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.008840589 = product of:
      0.017681178 = sum of:
        0.017681178 = product of:
          0.035362355 = sum of:
            0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035362355 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  3. Aldosari, M.; Sanderson, M.; Tam, A.; Uitdenbogerd, A.L.: Understanding collaborative search for places of interest (2016) 0.01
    0.0079682255 = product of:
      0.015936451 = sum of:
        0.015936451 = product of:
          0.031872902 = sum of:
            0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031872902 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Finding a place of interest (e.g., a restaurant, hotel, or attraction) is often related to a group information need, however, the actual multiparty collaboration in such searches has not been explored, and little is known about its significance and related practices. We surveyed 100 computer science students and found that 94% (of respondents) searched for places online; 87% had done so as part of a group. Search for place by multiple active participants was experienced by 78%, with group sizes typically being 2 or 3. Search occurred in a range of settings with both desktop PCs and mobile devices. Difficulties were reported with coordinating tasks, sharing results, and making decisions. The results show that finding a place of interest is a quite different group-based search than other multiparty information-seeking activities. The results suggest that local search systems, their interfaces and the devices that access them can be made more usable for collaborative search if they include support for coordination, sharing of results, and decision making.