Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.02
0.022347918 = product of:
0.06704375 = sum of:
0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028025504 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.039018244 = product of:
0.07803649 = sum of:
0.07803649 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07803649 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.04725067 = queryNorm
0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Rethinking UDC
