-
Brenner, E.H.; Saracevic, T.: Indexing and searching in perspective (1985)
0.03
0.029083757 = product of:
0.08725127 = sum of:
0.08725127 = product of:
0.17450254 = sum of:
0.17450254 = weight(_text_:indexing in 8129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17450254 = score(doc=8129,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051861014 = queryNorm
0.8790302 = fieldWeight in 8129, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- LCSH
- Indexing.
- Subject
- Indexing.
-
Saracevic, T.: Information retrieval (1985)
0.03
0.027704587 = product of:
0.08311376 = sum of:
0.08311376 = product of:
0.16622752 = sum of:
0.16622752 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16622752 = score(doc=3302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051861014 = queryNorm
0.8373461 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Philadelphia, Pa : National Federation of Abstracting and Indexing Services
- Source
- Indexing and searching in perspective. Ed.: E.H. Brenner u. T. Saracevic
-
Saracevic, T.: Indexing, searching, and relevance (1989)
0.02
0.019389171 = product of:
0.058167513 = sum of:
0.058167513 = product of:
0.11633503 = sum of:
0.11633503 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11633503 = score(doc=3615,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1985171 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051861014 = queryNorm
0.5860202 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- "As noted by many critics, the present design of online subject access, be it through library catalogs or online retrieval systems, does not accomodate human variability in searching (or indexing). This calls for radically different design principles and inplementations ir order to accomodate the observed patterns, interactions,and differences in human information behavior, of which the overlap findings are one of the important manifestations" (S.107)
- Source
- Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.01
0.011710754 = product of:
0.03513226 = sum of:
0.03513226 = product of:
0.07026452 = sum of:
0.07026452 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07026452 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18160844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051861014 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-25