Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sartorius, E.J."
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020) 0.01 
    0.00655477 = product of:
  0.016386924 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.010938003 = product of:
      0.021876005 = sum of:
        0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021876005 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
    Type
    a
  2. Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : ein neuer Studienschwerpunkt für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Forschungseinrichtungen (2020) 0.01 
    0.005751905 = product of:
  0.014379762 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=5858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
    0.0089308405 = product of:
      0.017861681 = sum of:
        0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017861681 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
    Type
    a

Authors