Talja, S.; Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R.: "Isms" in information science : constructivism, collectivism and constructionism (2005)
0.00
0.002469724 = product of:
0.022227516 = sum of:
0.022227516 = weight(_text_:of in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022227516 = score(doc=4412,freq=18.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Describes the basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism. Design/methodology/approach - Presents a literature-based conceptual analysis. Pinpoints the differences between the positions in their conceptions of language and the nature and origin of knowledge. Findings - Each of the three metatheories addresses and solves specific types of research questions and design problems. The metatheories thus complement one another. Each of the three metatheories encourages and constitutes a distinctive type of research and learning. Originality/value - Outlines each metatheory's specific fields of application.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.79-101
