Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Savolainen, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Savolainen, R.: Information use and information processing : comparison of conceptualizations (2009) 0.01
    0.011013864 = product of:
      0.044055454 = sum of:
        0.044055454 = product of:
          0.08811091 = sum of:
            0.08811091 = weight(_text_:processing in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08811091 = score(doc=564,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.4648076 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to elaborate the picture of the processes of information use by comparing conceptualizations provided by the constructivist approach and the human information processing approach. Design/methodology/approach - The article is a conceptual analysis of major articles characterizing information use and human information processing in the fields of information studies and consumer research. Findings - It is found that both research approaches share the assumption that interpreting, relating and comparing qualities of things is fundamental to the information use process. Research limitations/implications - The picture of information use processes is based on the comparison of two research approaches only. Originality/value - Compared to the numerous studies on information needs and seeking, the questions of information use have remained under-researched. The study elaborates the conceptual picture of information use processes by identifying similarities and differences between two major research approaches.
  2. Savolainen, R.: Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information (2008) 0.01
    0.005299047 = product of:
      0.021196188 = sum of:
        0.021196188 = product of:
          0.042392377 = sum of:
            0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042392377 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.274-293