-
Savolainen, R.: Manifestations of expert power in gatekeeping : a conceptual study (2020)
0.01
0.0060531073 = product of:
0.022194726 = sum of:
0.0043660053 = weight(_text_:a in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0043660053 = score(doc=5981,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=5981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=5981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- This study aims to elaborate the picture of the relationships between information and power by examining how expert power appears in the characterizations of gatekeeping presented in the research literature. Design/methodology/approach This study uses conceptual analysis for examining how expert power is constitutive of the construct of gatekeeper and how people subject to the influence of gatekeeping trust or challenge the expert power attributed to gatekeepers. The study draws on the analysis of 40 key studies on the above issues. Findings Researchers have mainly constructed the gatekeepers' expert power in terms of superior knowledge and skills applicable to a specific domain, coupled with an ability to control or facilitate access to information. The gatekeeper's expert power has been approached as a contextual factor that facilitates rather than controls access to information. The power relationships between the gatekeepers and those subject to gatekeeping vary contextually, depending on the extent to which the latter have access to alternative sources of information. The findings highlight the need to elaborate the construct of gatekeeping by rethinking its relevance in the networked information environments where the traditional picture of gatekeepers controlling access to information sources is eroding. Research limitations/implications As the study focuses on how expert power figures in gatekeeping, no attention is devoted to the role of social power of other types, for example, reward power and referent power. Originality/value The study pioneers by providing an in-depth analysis of the nature of expert power as a constituent of gatekeeping.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 76(2020) no.6, S.1215-1232
- Type
- a
-
Heinström, J.; Sormunen, E.; Savolainen, R.; Ek, S.: Developing an empirical measure of everyday information mastering (2020)
0.01
0.005980827 = product of:
0.021929698 = sum of:
0.0033818933 = weight(_text_:a in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033818933 = score(doc=5914,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024550997 = score(doc=5914,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- The aim of the study was to develop an empirical measure for everyday information mastering (EIM). EIM describes the ways that individuals, based on their beliefs, attitudes, and expectations, orient themselves to information as a resource of everyday action. The key features of EIM were identified by conceptual analysis focusing on three EIM frameworks. Four modes of EIM-Proactive, Social, Reactive, and Passive-and their 12 constituents were identified. A survey of 39 items was developed in two pilot studies to operationalize the identified modes as measurable EIM constituents. The respondents in the main study were upper secondary school students (n = 412). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to validate subscales for each EIM constituent. Seven subscales emerged: Inquiring and Scanning in the Proactive mode, Social media-centered, and Experiential in the Social mode, and Information poor, Overwhelmed, and Blunting in the Passive mode. Two constituents, Serendipitous and Intuitive, were not supported in the EFA. The findings highlight that the core constituents of an individual's everyday information mastering can be operationalized as psychometric scales. The instrument contributes to the systematic empirical study of EIM constituents and their relationships. The study further sheds light on key modes of EIM.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.729-741
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Source preference criteria in the context of everyday projects : relevance judgments made by prospective home buyers (2010)
0.01
0.005927399 = product of:
0.021733794 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=3620,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to elaborate how source preference criteria are defined in the context of everyday projects that require the seeking of problem-specific information. More specifically, to find out how information seekers explain their preference criteria by characterizing the perceived strengths and weaknesses of diverse sources. Design/methodology/approach - The approach takes the form of qualitative content analysis of empirical data gathered by semi-structured interviews with 16 prospective home buyers in 2008. The source preference criteria were elicited by making use of the construct of information source horizon. Findings - Networked sources were favoured most strongly, followed by printed media, human sources and organizational sources. Content of information was the primary source preference criterion. Availability of information was a fairly important criterion, while user characteristics, usability of information and situational factors were fairly marginal in this regard. In the definition of the preference criteria, more emphasis was placed on the perceived strengths than weaknesses of sources. Positive qualities such as "provides updated information" were referred to particularly while judging the relevance of the networked sources. Negative qualities like "outdated information" were primarily associated with printed media and organizational sources. Research limitations/implications - The study is exploratory, drawing on a relatively small sample recruited through a web-based service. Thus, the findings cannot be generalized to prospective home buyers. Practical implications - Prospective home buyers tend to favour web-based information sources and services. They should provide the customers with detailed information about the property, including photos. Originality/value - The paper specifies the picture of user-defined relevance judgment in the context of everyday life information seeking.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 66(2010) no.1, S.70-92
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: ¬The interplay of affective and cognitive factors in information seeking and use : comparing Kuhlthau's and Nahl's models (2015)
0.01
0.005927399 = product of:
0.021733794 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=1789,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the conceptual picture of the relationships between the affective and cognitive factors in information seeking and use. Design/methodology/approach - Conceptual analysis focusing on the ways in which the affective and cognitive factors and their interplay are approached in the Information Search Process model developed by Carol Kuhlthau, and the Social-Biological Information Technology model elaborated by Diane Nahl. Findings - Kuhlthau's model approaches the cognitive factors (thoughts) and affective factors (feelings) and affective-cognitive factors (mood) as integral constituents of the six-stage information search process. Thoughts determine the valence of feelings (positive or negative), while mood opens or closes the range of possibilities in a search. Nahl's taxonomic model defines the affective and cognitive factors as components of a biologically determined process serving the ends of adaptation to information ecology. The interplay of the above factors is conceptualized by focusing on their mutual roles in the cognitive and affective appraisal of information. Research limitations/implications - The findings are based on the comparison of two models only. Originality/value - So far, information scientists have largely ignored the study of the interplay between affective and cognitive factors in information seeking and use. The findings indicate that the examination of these factors together rather than separately holds a good potential to elaborate the holistic picture of information seeking and use.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 71(2015) no.1, S.175-197
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Information seeking and searching strategies as plans and patterns of action : a conceptual analysis (2016)
0.01
0.005927399 = product of:
0.021733794 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=3361,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the picture of strategies for information searching and seeking by reviewing the conceptualizations on this topic in the field of library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach The study draws on Henry Mintzberg's idea of strategy as plan and strategy as pattern in a stream of actions. Conceptual analysis of 57 LIS investigations was conducted to find out how researchers have approached the above aspects in the characterizations of information search and seeking strategies. Findings In the conceptualizations of information search and information seeking strategies, the aspect of strategy as plan is explicated most clearly in text-book approaches describing the steps of rational web searching. Most conceptualizations focus on the aspect of strategy as pattern in a stream of actions. This approach places the main emphasis on realized strategies, either deliberate or emergent. Deliberate strategies indicate how information search or information seeking processes were oriented by intentions that existed previously. Emergent strategies indicate how patterns in information seeking and seeking developed in the absence of intentions, or despite them. Research limitations/implications The conceptualizations of the shifts in information seeking and searching strategies were excluded from the study. Similarly, conceptualizations of information search or information retrieval tactics were not examined. Originality/value The study pioneers by providing an in-depth analysis of the ways in which the key aspects of strategy are conceptualized in the classifications and typologies of information seeking and searching strategies. The findings contribute to the elaboration of the conceptual space of information behaviour research.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 72(2016) no.6, S.1154-1180
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Heuristics elements of information-seeking strategies and tactics : a conceptual analysis (2017)
0.01
0.005927399 = product of:
0.021733794 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 4046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=4046,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4046, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4046)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 4046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=4046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4046)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=4046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4046)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the picture of strategies and tactics for information seeking and searching by focusing on the heuristic elements of such strategies and tactics. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual analysis of a sample of 31 pertinent investigations was conducted to find out how researchers have approached heuristics in the above context since the 1970s. To achieve this, the study draws on the ideas produced within the research programmes on Heuristics and Biases, and Fast and Frugal Heuristics. Findings Researchers have approached the heuristic elements in three major ways. First, these elements are defined as general level constituents of browsing strategies in particular. Second, heuristics are approached as search tips. Third, there are examples of conceptualizations of individual heuristics. Familiarity heuristic suggests that people tend to prefer sources that have worked well in similar situations in the past. Recognition heuristic draws on an all-or-none distinction of the information objects, based on cues such as information scent. Finally, representativeness heuristic is based on recalling similar instances of events or objects and judging their typicality in terms of genres, for example. Research limitations/implications As the study focuses on three heuristics only, the findings cannot be generalized to describe the use of all heuristic elements of strategies and tactics for information seeking and searching. Originality/value The study pioneers by providing an in-depth analysis of the ways in which the heuristic elements are conceptualized in the context of information seeking and searching. The findings contribute to the elaboration of the conceptual issues of information behavior research.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.6, S.1322-1342
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Interpreting informational cues : an explorative study on information use among prospective homebuyers (2009)
0.01
0.005784713 = product of:
0.021210615 = sum of:
0.0033818933 = weight(_text_:a in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033818933 = score(doc=3162,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- This article elaborates the picture of information use from the perspective of interpreting informational cues about the attributes of entities. It is assumed that such activity draws on cognitive mechanisms that are employed as the constituents of diverse interpretation approaches to informational cues. The empirical data of the study were gathered by means of think aloud method from 16 prospective homebuyers in 2008. The participants interpreted informational cues available in announcements published in a printed housing listing issue and a Web-based information system serving the needs of prospective homebuyers. The data were examined by means of qualitative content analysis. By drawing on the findings of Zhang and her associates, the study revealed 7 cognitive mechanisms: identification of key attributes, specification, evaluation, comparison by similarity, comparison by differentiation, explanation, and conclusion. Three major approaches employed in the interpetation of informational cues were identified. The descriptive-evaluative approach draws on the identification and evaluation of individual attributes of an entity. The comparative approach is more sophisticated because it is based on the evaluation of the attributes by their perceived similarity or differentiation. Finally, the explanatory approach draws on the identification of attributes with causal potential.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2244-2254
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.; Thomson, L.: Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices (2022)
0.01
0.0056154616 = product of:
0.020590026 = sum of:
0.0027613041 = weight(_text_:a in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027613041 = score(doc=526,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- The present study contributes to the development of integrated models for information behavior and practices at the domain-specific level. To this end, the model for everyday information practices proposed by Savolainen in 2008 is enhanced by integrating the element of information creating, based on Thomson's recent 2018 study. The integration resulted in the expanded model for everyday information practices. Using conceptual analysis, the above model was examined in light of conventional (positivist and post-positivist) and interpretive (social constructivist) criteria for theory assessment. The findings suggest that the integrated model meets best the interpretive criteria such as meaningfulness and understandability, mutuality of concepts and descriptive logic, empirical verifiability, and usefulness. In contrast, theoretical potential of the model is fairly limited when weighed against the conventional criteria, such as generalization and prediction. Overall, the findings suggest that, in its current form, the expanded model cannot be regarded as a "genuine theory" of everyday information practices. However, the model does incorporate many of the qualities characteristic of social scientific theories, and thus exhibits considerable theoretical potential. This is even more so if the interpretive, naturalistic basis of the data in which the expanded model is based is considered.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.4, S.511-527
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information (2008)
0.01
0.0053948886 = product of:
0.019781258 = sum of:
0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019525366 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.274-293
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums (2011)
0.01
0.0053948886 = product of:
0.019781258 = sum of:
0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019525366 = score(doc=4477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=4477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=4477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1243-1256
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Conceptual growth in integrated models for information behaviour (2016)
0.01
0.0053948886 = product of:
0.019781258 = sum of:
0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 3029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019525366 = score(doc=3029,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3029, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3029)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=3029,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3029, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3029)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=3029,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3029, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3029)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 72(2016) no.4, S.648-673
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Cognitive authority as an instance of informational and expert power (2022)
0.01
0.0053948886 = product of:
0.019781258 = sum of:
0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019525366 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Libri. 72(2022) no.1, S.1-12
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: ¬The role of emotions in online information seeking and sharing : a case study of consumer awareness (2015)
0.00
0.004741919 = product of:
0.017387036 = sum of:
0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 2319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031240587 = score(doc=2319,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2319, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2319)
0.012874164 = weight(_text_:r in 2319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012874164 = score(doc=2319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 2319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2319)
0.0013888142 = weight(_text_:s in 2319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0013888142 = score(doc=2319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2319)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to specify the role of emotions played in information seeking and sharing taking place in online discussion forum. To this end, an explorative study was made that focussed on consumer awareness. Design/methodology/approach - The study is based on the analysis of a sample of 30 discussion threads containing altogether 1,630 messages available in Canadian Content - a major online platform. The expression of emotions was examined by using the categories of the interaction process analysis (IPA) model. Two research questions were addressed: first, what kind of emotions are expressed in the four functional areas of the IPA model when discussing online about consumer awareness? and second, what is the role of positive and negative emotions in information seeking and sharing about the above topic? The data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Findings - Of the emotional expressions, 42 percent were positive and 58 percent negative. The most frequent emotions were amusement, contempt, worry, irritation and pleasure. The frequencies of positive and emotional expressions varied in the context of 12 IPA categories. Positive emotions predominated when participants showed solidarity or agreed, while negative emotions were particularly prevalent when indicating antagonism. The repertoire of positive and negative emotions was broadest while providing opinions or sharing information with others. In contrast, emotions were expressed rarely in the context of information seeking. Research limitations/implications - The study is explorative in nature and the findings are based on the examination of an online discussion group focussed on the issues of consumer awareness. Originality/value - The study contributes to the study of affective factors in computer-mediated interaction by empirically specifying the repertoire of positive and negative emotions expressed in online discussion.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 71(2015) no.6, S.1203-1227
- Type
- a
-
Savolainen, R.: Everyday life information seeking (2009)
0.00
0.004113602 = product of:
0.02262481 = sum of:
0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033135647 = score(doc=3780,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Information seeking may be analyzed in two major contexts: job-related and nonwork. The present entry concentrates on nonwork information seeking, more properly called everyday life information seeking (ELIS). Typically, ELIS studies discuss the ways in which people access and use various information sources to meet information needs in areas such as health, consumption, and leisure. The entry specifies the concept of ELIS and characterizes the major ELIS models. They include the Sense-Making approach (Dervin), the Small world theory (Chatman), the ecological model of ELIS (Williamson), ELIS in the context of way of life (Savolainen), the model of information practices (McKenzie), and the concept of information grounds (Fisher). ELIS practices tend to draw on the habitualized use of a limited number of sources which have been found useful in previous use contexts. Since the late 1990s, the Internet has increasingly affected the ELIS practices by providing easily accessible sources. Even though the popularity of the networked sources has grown rapidly they will complement, rather than replace, more traditional sources and channels.
- Type
- a
