Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Savoy, J."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dolamic, L.; Savoy, J.: Retrieval effectiveness of machine translated queries (2010) 0.00 
    0.0046948725 = product of:
  0.032864105 = sum of:
    0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070881573 = score(doc=4102,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
    0.025775949 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025775949 = score(doc=4102,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    This article describes and evaluates various information retrieval models used to search document collections written in English through submitting queries written in various other languages, either members of the Indo-European family (English, French, German, and Spanish) or radically different language groups such as Chinese. This evaluation method involves searching a rather large number of topics (around 300) and using two commercial machine translation systems to translate across the language barriers. In this study, mean average precision is used to measure variances in retrieval effectiveness when a query language differs from the document language. Although performance differences are rather large for certain languages pairs, this does not mean that bilingual search methods are not commercially viable. Causes of the difficulties incurred when searching or during translation are analyzed and the results of concrete examples are explained.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.11, S.2266-2273
  2. Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016) 0.00 
    0.0017838344 = product of:
  0.012486841 = sum of:
    0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004176737 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
    0.008310104 = product of:
      0.016620208 = sum of:
        0.016620208 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016620208 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Date
    7. 5.2016 21:22:27
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
  3. Kocher, M.; Savoy, J.: ¬A simple and efficient algorithm for authorship verification (2017) 0.00 
    3.5800604E-4 = product of:
  0.0050120843 = sum of:
    0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 3330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050120843 = score(doc=3330,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3330, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3330)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.259-269
  4. Savoy, J.: Text clustering : an application with the 'State of the Union' addresses (2015) 0.00 
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
  0.004176737 = sum of:
    0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 2128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004176737 = score(doc=2128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2128)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1645-1654
  5. Savoy, J.: Text representation strategies : an example with the State of the union addresses (2016) 0.00 
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
  0.004176737 = sum of:
    0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004176737 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.8, S.1858-1870
  6. Savoy, J.: Authorship of Pauline epistles revisited (2019) 0.00 
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
  0.004176737 = sum of:
    0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004176737 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02453417 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.10, S.1089-1097

Authors

Themes