-
Saye, J.D.: Mannheimer's cataloging and classification : a workbook (1991)
0.00
0.0027686604 = product of:
0.027686603 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
0.017569361 = product of:
0.052708082 = sum of:
0.052708082 = weight(_text_:l in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052708082 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 36(1992) no.2, S.250 (L. Osmus)
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.00
0.0016373465 = product of:
0.016373465 = sum of:
0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005915991 = score(doc=103,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.008767224 = product of:
0.017534448 = sum of:
0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017534448 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 43(1999) no.2, S.78-94
-
Haynes, K.J.M.; Saye, J.D.; Kaid, L.L.: Cataloging collection-level records for archival video and audio recordings (1993)
0.00
0.0015287049 = product of:
0.015287049 = sum of:
0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030866629 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.010228428 = product of:
0.020456856 = sum of:
0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020456856 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Describes a project to create a bibliographic control system for archival quality video and audio recordings of political commercials. The project objectives were: to design a local computer searchable database; prepare item level records for the local database; and prepare collection level records for the OCLC Online Union Catalog. The collection level records are intended to alert scholars, researchers, and other potential users to the existence of the archive and to direct them to it for more powerful item level searching in the local database. Some of the cataloguing problems discussed are: choice of cataloguing tools and MARC formats; organization of the collections around the political candidate, and name authority
- Date
- 12. 1.2007 14:43:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 18(1993) no.2, S.19-32
-
Saye, J.D.: Education for technical services : a summary of the symposium (1993)
0.00
6.0353905E-4 = product of:
0.009053085 = sum of:
0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006236001 = score(doc=4564,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0028170836 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This article highlights key points made by presenters at the Third Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium and relates them to trends and needs in the education of specialists in technical services.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.3, S.125-141
-
Saye, J.D.; Bohannan, A.J.; Saye, T.O.: Mannheimer's cataloging and classification (2000)
0.00
5.781282E-4 = product of:
0.008671923 = sum of:
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033805002 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- xiv, 396 S. + CD-ROM
- Series
- Books in library and information science
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009)
0.00
5.58707E-4 = product of:
0.008380604 = sum of:
0.006972062 = weight(_text_:in in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006972062 = score(doc=2843,freq=20.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.3, S.500-514
-
Saye, J.D.: ¬The cataloging experience in library and information science education : an educator's perspective (1987)
0.00
5.43019E-4 = product of:
0.008145284 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=387,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This paper presents one approach to the teaching of both the basic and advanced courses in cataloging. In addressing the basic course, short-term and long-term objectives of the course are identified for four categories of students-Cataloging Specialists, General/Special Librarians, Non-Cataloging Specialists and Non-Library Information Specialists. The philosophy underlying this mode of instruction places emphasis upon group interaction and making the course enjoyable for the student, thus increasing interest while imparting more information and better preparing the four groups of students for work in organizing information. Stress is placed upon student participation and the use of realistic situations to instruct and evaluate student performance.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.4, S.27-45
-
Saye, J.D.: Where are we and how did we get here? : place of cataloging in the library and information curriculum: causes and consequences (2002)
0.00
4.8788113E-4 = product of:
0.0073182164 = sum of:
0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 5447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053462577 = score(doc=5447,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5447, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5447)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=5447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5447)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Explores factors that have influenced library and information science education over the past two decades. Emphasis is placed on cataloging instruction and particularly cataloging as a required course. Identifies the introduction of new areas of study, corresponding curricular changes, and the nature of LIS faculty as influencing the role of cataloging in the professional education of librarians. An analysis is provided of the changing perception of the importance of cataloging in professional library education programs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.121-143
-
Saye, J.D.: ¬"The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment" : a reaction (1990)
0.00
4.6544487E-4 = product of:
0.0069816727 = sum of:
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=492,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This response to the paper by Dr. Chan, while accepting the merits of call number searching in the theoretical sense, raises questions about its usefulness in typical library situations. Compares searching on-line with call numbers and the use of classified catalogues and shelflists. Asks who is expected to do call number searching. Considers the availability of indexes to the classification scheme, problems created by the provision of only 1 class number per document, and the use of multiple cutter numbers to express the subject of a document.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) no.1, S.27-35
