Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schäuble, P."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Schäuble, P.: Informationssuche im Umbruch (1995) 0.11
    0.11371015 = product of:
      0.17056522 = sum of:
        0.090091646 = weight(_text_:im in 3648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090091646 = score(doc=3648,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.6246374 = fieldWeight in 3648, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3648)
        0.08047357 = product of:
          0.12071036 = sum of:
            0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051581617 = score(doc=3648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3648)
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=3648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Manuelles Blättern im Zettelkasten hat vielfach ausgedient. Konventionelle Dokumentationsmethodem werden mehr und mehr dutch modernen Methoden des Information Retrieval (IR) ersetzt. Doch auch im Umgang mit Datenbanken sind Benutzer kritischer geworden. Sie fragen immer öfter, wieviel der gewünschten Information nicht gefunden wurde, obwohl sie im Informationssystem gespeichert ist
    Date
    29. 3.1996 15:22:50
  2. Schäuble, P.: Kostengünstige Konversion großer Bibliothekskataloge (1996) 0.02
    0.01801833 = product of:
      0.054054987 = sum of:
        0.054054987 = weight(_text_:im in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054054987 = score(doc=4232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Kurzbericht über eine Konversion von Katalogkarten mit Automatischer Indexierung und grafischer Abbildung der Katalogkarten im Retrievalsystem
  3. Schäuble, P.: Multimedia information retrieval : content-based information retrieval from large text and audio databases (1997) 0.01
    0.011912266 = product of:
      0.035736796 = sum of:
        0.035736796 = product of:
          0.10721038 = sum of:
            0.10721038 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10721038 = score(doc=1892,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    The Kluwer international series on information retrieval
  4. Sheridan, P.; Ballerini, J.P.; Schäuble, P.: Building a large multilingual test collection from comparable news documents (1998) 0.01
    0.009726323 = product of:
      0.02917897 = sum of:
        0.02917897 = product of:
          0.08753691 = sum of:
            0.08753691 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08753691 = score(doc=6298,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 6298, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6298)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    The Kluwer International series on information retrieval
    Source
    Cross-language information retrieval. Ed.: G. Grefenstette
  5. Knaus, D.; Mittendorf, E.; Schäuble, P.; Sheridan, P.: Is recall relevant? : An analysis how user interface conditions affect strategies and performance in large scale text retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.00810527 = product of:
      0.024315808 = sum of:
        0.024315808 = product of:
          0.07294742 = sum of:
            0.07294742 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07294742 = score(doc=7570,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 7570, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7570)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  6. Ballerini, J.-P.; Büchel, M.; Domenig, R.; Knaus, D.; Mateev, B.; Mittendorf, E.; Schäuble, P.; Wechsler, M.; Sheridan, P.: SPIDER retrieval system at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.00810527 = product of:
      0.024315808 = sum of:
        0.024315808 = product of:
          0.07294742 = sum of:
            0.07294742 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07294742 = score(doc=3104,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 3104, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3104)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  7. Frei, H.P.; Meienberg, S.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The perils of interpreting recall and precision values (1991) 0.01
    0.0064842156 = product of:
      0.019452646 = sum of:
        0.019452646 = product of:
          0.058357935 = sum of:
            0.058357935 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058357935 = score(doc=786,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The traditional recall and precision measure is inappropriate when retrieval algorithms that retrieve information from Wide Area Networks are evaluated. The principle reason is that information available in WANs is dynamic and its size os orders of magnitude greater than the size of the usual test collections. To overcome these problems, a new efffectiveness measure has been developed, which we call the 'usefulness measure'
    Source
    Information retrieval: GI/GMD-Workshop, Darmstadt, 23.-24.6.1991: Proceedings. Ed.: N. Fuhr
  8. Frei, H.P.; Schäuble, P.: Determining the effectiveness of retrieval algorithms (1991) 0.01
    0.005956133 = product of:
      0.017868398 = sum of:
        0.017868398 = product of:
          0.05360519 = sum of:
            0.05360519 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05360519 = score(doc=787,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A new effectiveness measure ('usefulness measure') is proposed to circumvent the problems associated with the classical recall and precision measures. It is difficult to evaluate systems that filter extremly dynamic information; the determination of all relevant dodcuments in a real life collection is hardly affordable, and the specification of binary relevance assessments is often problematic. The new measure relies on an statistical approach with which two retrieval algorithms are compared. In contrast to the classical recall and precision measures, the new measure requires only relative judgments, and the reply of the retrieval system os compared directly with the information need of the user rather than with the query. The new measure has the added ability to determine an error probability that indicates haw stable the usefulness measure is. Using a test collection of abstracts from CACM, it is shown that our new measure is also capable of disclosing the effect of manually assigned descriptors and yields a results similar to that of the traditional recall and precision measures.