Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a angle %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1

Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.00
```
0.0030950191 = product of:
  0.049520306 = sum of:
    0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049520306 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
```
Abstract

This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.