Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011)
0.01
0.0052534994 = product of:
0.013133748 = sum of:
0.0083152475 = weight(_text_:a in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0083152475 = score(doc=649,freq=8.0), product of:
0.054392863 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.047173154 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.004818501 = product of:
0.009637002 = sum of:
0.009637002 = weight(_text_:information in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009637002 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08281143 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047173154 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
- Type
- a