-
Barry, C.I.; Schamber, L.: User-defined relevance criteria : a comparison of 2 studies (1995)
0.01
0.013315729 = product of:
0.026631458 = sum of:
0.026631458 = product of:
0.053262915 = sum of:
0.053262915 = weight(_text_:l in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053262915 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15161102 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.03814447 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: User criteria in relevance evaluation : toward development of a measurement scale (1996)
0.01
0.011651264 = product of:
0.023302527 = sum of:
0.023302527 = product of:
0.046605054 = sum of:
0.046605054 = weight(_text_:l in 7351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046605054 = score(doc=7351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15161102 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.03814447 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 7351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Barry, C.L.; Schamber, L.: Users' criteria for relevance evaluation : a cross-situational comparison (1998)
0.01
0.009986796 = product of:
0.019973593 = sum of:
0.019973593 = product of:
0.039947186 = sum of:
0.039947186 = weight(_text_:l in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039947186 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15161102 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.03814447 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)