Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schmitz-Esser, W."
  1. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬The one million picture bank as a challenge to language engineering and systems design (1994) 0.06
    0.05559852 = product of:
      0.11119704 = sum of:
        0.06770415 = weight(_text_:social in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06770415 = score(doc=1948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19209276 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04817278 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
        0.04349289 = product of:
          0.08698578 = sum of:
            0.08698578 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08698578 = score(doc=1948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21773462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04817278 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the practical aspects of creating and searching databases containing very large collections (1 million itms or more) of images. Notes that picture collections of this type and size pose new and unprecendented problems of access and management, not only on the technical and visual levels but also in terms of language and effective social communications. Explains the manner in which these problems are interlinked and makes suggestions as to how some of them may be overcome
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Wissensorganisation und Nutzung (2008) 0.01
    0.008463019 = product of:
      0.033852074 = sum of:
        0.033852074 = weight(_text_:social in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033852074 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19209276 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04817278 = queryNorm
            0.17622775 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    How can public media utterances of societal rank ("knowledge") be organized, not just by search words of a specific language as is practice of the day, but by their meaning and environmental intentions, expressed in some language, yes, but irrespective of a specific language, so as to enable to formalize this knowledge mediating cross-language ontologies that in turn support the action of knowledge machines? In such machines, knowledge could be "tamed" and put to use in a consistent, widely linguistically and logic-controlled way. Knowledge, once formalized, would be apt to be merged with (or segmented for) other ontologies, with a chance to make world-wide sharing of reliable knowledge come true. Moreover, formalization of knowledge in ontologies would produce new knowledge which in turn could be used to detect knowledge hidden in hitherto unknown texts and in heterogeneous texts to come in the future. Formalization of knowledge would enable, require, even cry for, responsible, knowledgeable human, and social, control. Educational curricula as known from library science and archival disciplines remain of importance, but will prove largely insufficient in the face of such challenges. Actually, in present new and upcoming ontology-based knowledge machines, the human resource is found addressed by labels such as peers, curators, knowledge and linguistic engineers and the like, names that all are falling short of expressing the most important three elements that have to come together in individuals and teams bound for constructing, maintaining and running cross-language ontologies for knowledge machines: Intimate domain/task expertise, full command of the source and target languages and their respective linguistics, and author-like, editorial responsibility that is up to the challenges of the new media world.
  3. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.008158433 = product of:
      0.032633733 = sum of:
        0.032633733 = product of:
          0.065267466 = sum of:
            0.065267466 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065267466 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16869287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04817278 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  4. Schmitz-Esser, W.: How to cope with dynamism in ontologies (2000) 0.01
    0.0057109036 = product of:
      0.022843614 = sum of:
        0.022843614 = product of:
          0.04568723 = sum of:
            0.04568723 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04568723 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16869287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04817278 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2002 13:22:08
  5. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.00
    0.00489506 = product of:
      0.01958024 = sum of:
        0.01958024 = product of:
          0.03916048 = sum of:
            0.03916048 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03916048 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16869287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04817278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22