Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Schmitz-Esser, W."
  1. Schmitz-Esser, W.: EXPO-INFO 2000 : Visuelles Besucherinformationssystem für Weltausstellungen (2000) 0.05 
    0.050590184 = product of:
  0.16863394 = sum of:
    0.028172014 = weight(_text_:und in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028172014 = score(doc=1404,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.441457 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
    0.058522265 = weight(_text_:formen in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058522265 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.33508438 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
    0.02381002 = weight(_text_:der in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02381002 = score(doc=1404,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.37019804 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
    0.028172014 = weight(_text_:und in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028172014 = score(doc=1404,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.441457 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
    0.021128364 = weight(_text_:des in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021128364 = score(doc=1404,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2649762 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
    0.008829262 = weight(_text_:in in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008829262 = score(doc=1404,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Das aktuelle Wissen der Welt im Spiegel einer Weltausstellung: Wie stellt man das dar und wie macht man es Interessierten zugänglich - in der Ausstellung, in Publikationen, im Funk und über das Internet? Was man alles auf einer Weltausstellung an der Schwelle zum dritten Jahrtausend sehen und erfahren kann, sprengt in Fülle und Vielfalt jeden individuell faßbaren Rahmen. Schmitz-Esser zeigt in seinem Buch, wie der Besucher wahlweise in vier Sprachen die Weltausstellung erleben und die Quintessenz davon mitnehmen kann. Ermöglicht wird dies durch das Konzept des virtuellen "Wissens in der Kapsel", das so aufbereitet ist, daß es in allen gängigen medialen Formen und für unterschiedlichste Wege der Aneignung eingesetzt werden kann. Die Lösung ist nicht nur eine Sache der Informatik und Informationstechnologie, sondern vielmehr auch eine Herausforderung an Informationswissenschaft und Computerlinguistik. Das Buch stellt Ziel, Ansatz, Komponenten und Voraussetzungen dafür dar.
    Content
    Willkommene Anregung schon am Eingang.- Vertiefung des Wissens während der Ausstellung.- Alles für das Wohlbefinden.- Die Systemstruktur und ihre einzelnen Elemente.- Wovon alles ausgeht.- Den Stoff als Topics und Subtopics strukturieren.- Die Nutshells.- Der Proxy-Text.Der Thesaurus.- Gedankenraumreisen.- Und zurück in die reale Welt.- Weitergehende Produkte.- Das EXPO-Infosystem auf einen Blick.- Register.- Literaturverzeichnis.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Gedankenraumreisen : neue Thesaurusstrukturen, multimedial präsentiert, machen Anregung, Spielen, Lernen, Finden möglich für jedermann (2000) 0.04 
    0.04243122 = product of:
  0.1414374 = sum of:
    0.02344053 = weight(_text_:und in 6645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02344053 = score(doc=6645,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 6645, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6645)
    0.027493443 = weight(_text_:der in 6645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027493443 = score(doc=6645,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 6645, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6645)
    0.042024978 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 6645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042024978 = score(doc=6645,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.28395358 = fieldWeight in 6645, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6645)
    0.02344053 = weight(_text_:und in 6645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02344053 = score(doc=6645,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 6645, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6645)
    0.017251236 = weight(_text_:des in 6645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017251236 = score(doc=6645,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.21635216 = fieldWeight in 6645, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6645)
    0.0077866786 = weight(_text_:in in 6645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077866786 = score(doc=6645,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 6645, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6645)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Zahlreich sind die Versuche, Strukturen begrifflicher Relationen, wie sie in Thesauren niedergelegt sind, durch Visualisierung verständlicher zu machen, doch nirgends ist das bisher in überzeugender Weise gelungen. Damit blieb der Gebrauch von Thesauri durchweg auf Fachleute (Dokumentare) verwiesen und eine Anwendung in der Breite fand nicht statt. Mit den neuen Möglichkeiten visueller und auditiver Darstellung, wie sie nun die Informationstechnologie bietet, läßt sich das ändern. Berichtet wird über ein Projekt im Zusammenhang mit der EXP02000, bei dem versucht wird, bisher weitgehend ungenutzte Potentiale von Thesauri für die Interaktion am Computer zu nutzen. Akteur am Point of Information ist dabei jeder Interessierte, gleich ob Laie oder Fachmann, Gegenstand der Strukturierung die Welt im Jahre 2000, Zugangssprache die Sprache der allgemeinen Kommunikation. Einsicht in die begrifflichen Strukturen in dem Sinne, daß man sie versteht, ist nicht erforderlich, die multimediale Präsentation ermöglicht sensitives Erfassen und nähert sich gewohntem intuitiven Umgang mit Begrifflichkeiten. Jedermann kann so durch den Gedankenraum "reisen", sinnvollen Verknüpfungen und Wirkketten nachspüren, begriffliche Klärung und Einsichten gewinnen, für den Begriff das richtige Wort finden. Bei solch einer Reise wird er zugleich auch auf überraschende Zusammenhänge stoßen. Der Sprung in die Quellen wird von jedem angesteuerten Punkt aus möglich. Die Grenzen des herkömmlichen Information Retrieval zerfließen damit und öffnen sich hin zu neuen, bisher vernachlässigten Räumen: dem Erleben, der Anregung, dem sinnvollen Spiel, der Überraschung, dem unterhaltsamen Lernen
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.6
    Source
    Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Formalizing terminology-based knowledge for an ontology independently of a particular language (2008) 0.03 
    0.03316094 = product of:
  0.110536456 = sum of:
    0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042282857 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009376213 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.02129633 = weight(_text_:der in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02129633 = score(doc=1680,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009376213 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00706341 = score(doc=1680,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.021141429 = product of:
      0.042282857 = sum of:
        0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042282857 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Last word ontological thought and practice is exemplified on an axiomatic framework [a model for an Integrative Cross-Language Ontology (ICLO), cf. Poli, R., Schmitz-Esser, W., forthcoming 2007] that is highly general, based on natural language, multilingual, can be implemented as topic maps and may be openly enhanced by software available for particular languages. Basics of ontological modelling, conditions for construction and maintenance, and the most salient points in application are addressed, such as cross-language text mining and knowledge generation. The rationale is to open the eyes for the tremendous potential of terminology-based ontologies for principled Knowledge Organization and the interchange and reuse of formalized knowledge.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  4. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Neue Anwendungsgebiete für Thesauri : Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie (1992) 0.03 
    0.030020608 = product of:
  0.12008243 = sum of:
    0.022099946 = weight(_text_:und in 1366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022099946 = score(doc=1366,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 1366, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1366)
    0.035493884 = weight(_text_:der in 1366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035493884 = score(doc=1366,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.55185866 = fieldWeight in 1366, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1366)
    0.022099946 = weight(_text_:und in 1366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022099946 = score(doc=1366,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 1366, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1366)
    0.034502473 = weight(_text_:des in 1366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034502473 = score(doc=1366,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.43270433 = fieldWeight in 1366, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1366)
    0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 1366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005886175 = score(doc=1366,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1366, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1366)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.2
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬Ein Thesaurus als Teil eines terminologischen Lexikons (1995) 0.03 
    0.028662998 = product of:
  0.11465199 = sum of:
    0.017679956 = weight(_text_:und in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017679956 = score(doc=2075,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
    0.033597544 = weight(_text_:der in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033597544 = score(doc=2075,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.5223744 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
    0.017679956 = weight(_text_:und in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017679956 = score(doc=2075,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
    0.039035093 = weight(_text_:des in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039035093 = score(doc=2075,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.48954904 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
    0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006659447 = score(doc=2075,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag enthält die Vorstellung des Entwurfs eines neuen Thesaurus-Konzepts, der vom Komitee für Thesaurusforschung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation entwickelt worden ist. In diesem Konzept soll der Thesaurus nicht allein dem Information Retrieval dienen, es soll als terminologisches Werkzeug auf möglichst allen Feldern des 'Linguistic engineering' eingesetzt werden können.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.3
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  6. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Publikumsfragen an Literatur zur Zeitgeschichte (1993) 0.03 
    0.026660249 = product of:
  0.13330124 = sum of:
    0.032480154 = weight(_text_:und in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032480154 = score(doc=4411,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
    0.026937963 = weight(_text_:der in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026937963 = score(doc=4411,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
    0.032480154 = weight(_text_:und in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032480154 = score(doc=4411,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
    0.041402966 = weight(_text_:des in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041402966 = score(doc=4411,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.51924515 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Darstellung zur Entwicklung eines Thesaurus für die Bibliothek des Hauses der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und seiner Anwendung auf die vorhandene Literatur (1300 Deskriptoren und 300 Modifikatoren)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬Die Pressedatenbank für Text und Bild des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (1977) 0.03 
    0.026254812 = product of:
  0.10501925 = sum of:
    0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018752426 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
    0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019048017 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
    0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018752426 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
    0.041402966 = weight(_text_:des in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041402966 = score(doc=4756,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.51924515 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
    0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00706341 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Footnote
    In diesem Aufsatz wird auch der Aufbau des G+J Index ausführlich erläutert
  8. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Wissensorganisation und Nutzung (2008) 0.02 
    0.024983758 = product of:
  0.08327919 = sum of:
    0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028188571 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
    0.008839978 = weight(_text_:und in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008839978 = score(doc=1693,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
    0.014197553 = weight(_text_:der in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014197553 = score(doc=1693,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.22074346 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
    0.008839978 = weight(_text_:und in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008839978 = score(doc=1693,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
    0.009118824 = weight(_text_:in in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009118824 = score(doc=1693,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.23282567 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
    0.014094286 = product of:
      0.028188571 = sum of:
        0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028188571 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    How can public media utterances of societal rank ("knowledge") be organized, not just by search words of a specific language as is practice of the day, but by their meaning and environmental intentions, expressed in some language, yes, but irrespective of a specific language, so as to enable to formalize this knowledge mediating cross-language ontologies that in turn support the action of knowledge machines? In such machines, knowledge could be "tamed" and put to use in a consistent, widely linguistically and logic-controlled way. Knowledge, once formalized, would be apt to be merged with (or segmented for) other ontologies, with a chance to make world-wide sharing of reliable knowledge come true. Moreover, formalization of knowledge in ontologies would produce new knowledge which in turn could be used to detect knowledge hidden in hitherto unknown texts and in heterogeneous texts to come in the future. Formalization of knowledge would enable, require, even cry for, responsible, knowledgeable human, and social, control. Educational curricula as known from library science and archival disciplines remain of importance, but will prove largely insufficient in the face of such challenges. Actually, in present new and upcoming ontology-based knowledge machines, the human resource is found addressed by labels such as peers, curators, knowledge and linguistic engineers and the like, names that all are falling short of expressing the most important three elements that have to come together in individuals and teams bound for constructing, maintaining and running cross-language ontologies for knowledge machines: Intimate domain/task expertise, full command of the source and target languages and their respective linguistics, and author-like, editorial responsibility that is up to the challenges of the new media world.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  9. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Ontologies - what are they good for, and do they help us much? (2008) 0.02 
    0.023337496 = product of:
  0.07779165 = sum of:
    0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028188571 = score(doc=1684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
    0.0062508085 = weight(_text_:und in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062508085 = score(doc=1684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
    0.014197553 = weight(_text_:der in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014197553 = score(doc=1684,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.22074346 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
    0.0062508085 = weight(_text_:und in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062508085 = score(doc=1684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
    0.0088096205 = weight(_text_:in in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088096205 = score(doc=1684,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.22493094 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
    0.014094286 = product of:
      0.028188571 = sum of:
        0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028188571 = score(doc=1684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Modern ontologies, what are they good for? How did they take us in KO theory and application, and what can we expect from them in the future? These were the focal questions in an afternoon workshop initiated and run by three passionate knowledge organizers from the front of ontology research, Alexander Sigel (Cologne), Winfried Schmitz-Esser (Hamburg), and Roberto Poli (Trento), at the International ISKO 06 Congress in Vienna. Those who in the knowledge organization business till the classic grounds of library and archival sciences will more and more frequently find themselves stumbling over the classic, philösophical notion of ontolögy which now comes in a modern context where nothing can be achieved any longer without the assistance of the computer. They will be asking: Ontology, what is it, a prestige-fishing, fashionable, neo-term? Old wine in new skins? Or, rather, new wine in old skins? It was clear from the beginning that in Vienna, where KO theoreticians and practitioners from all over the world were to convene, some basic explanations and clarifications, and an overview on where we stand and where we go with modern ontolögies would be most welcome, and suitable. The workshop entitled "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" aimed straight at the heart of the ontology approach in Knowledge Organization: This is an urgently needed, better command of the deep-structured conceptual matter, - beyond of the potentials and constraints of linguistics and the languages. With this, one was right in the middle of the problem that has been haunting knowledge organizers ever since up to the present day.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  10. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬Der Fachzeitschriftenaufsatz elektronisch auf den Tisch (1994) 0.02 
    0.016628886 = product of:
  0.08314443 = sum of:
    0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015627023 = score(doc=1337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
    0.027493443 = weight(_text_:der in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027493443 = score(doc=1337,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
    0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015627023 = score(doc=1337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
    0.024396934 = weight(_text_:des in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024396934 = score(doc=1337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Der Traum des Wissenschaftlers, der auf seine Fachzeitschriften angewiesen ist: die 'heißen' Aufsätze gleich auf den Tisch, den Hausverteiler nicht erst abwarten müssen, sich den Gang zur Bibliothek sparen! Im Fachbereich Humanmedizin und Biowissenschaften wurde die Wunschvorstellung jetzt Wirklichkeit
  11. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.013039296 = product of:
  0.052157182 = sum of:
    0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009376213 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
    0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009376213 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
    0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014638159 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
    0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00706341 = score(doc=4116,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
    0.011703186 = product of:
      0.023406371 = sum of:
        0.023406371 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023406371 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  12. Schmitz-Esser, W.: New approaches in thesaurus application (1991) 0.01 
    0.009218458 = product of:
  0.04609229 = sum of:
    0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010938915 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
    0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010938915 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
    0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017077852 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
    0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071366085 = score(doc=2111,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    To show the difference and explain the move to a new kind of thesauri in the information science area, some of the main characteristics of conventional thesauri are pointed out as well as their side-effects. The new approaches for thesauri apllication are seen to exist in (1) expert systems, (2) interface systems, (3) object oriented design and programming, (4) hypertext systems, (5) machine translation, and (6) machine abstracting. These areas are shortly described including also the new problem which they might create. A discussion of the limitations of the new thesaurus application areas finishes the article which challenges, finally, an awareness to meet the new possibilities of a thesaural retrieval
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesauri facing new challenges (1990) 0.01 
    0.008956539 = product of:
  0.0447827 = sum of:
    0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010938915 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
    0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010938915 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
    0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017077852 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
    0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005827016 = score(doc=2218,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    The chairman of the thesaurus software seminar held on 14.8.1990 in Darmstadt, introduces into the topics by asking the following 10 questions and by providing his answers to them: (1) what is new in the view? (2) what is the real point of attraction? (3) cannot information retrieval profit from machine processing of language? (4) can we do better now? (5) how van we do better? (6) when does fully automatic IR arrive? (7) thesauri for machine-aided IR - how do we get there? (8) which is the right way, which is the model, what to standardize? (9) can IR people do it alone? (10) are there advanced information services with a truly human interface
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  14. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Modélisation, au moyen d'un thésaurus encyclopédique et plurilingue, des connaissances présentées au cours de l'Exposition Mondialede l'an 2000 (1999) 0.01 
    0.008821293 = product of:
  0.058808617 = sum of:
    0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012501617 = score(doc=6296,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
    0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012501617 = score(doc=6296,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
    0.033805385 = weight(_text_:des in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033805385 = score(doc=6296,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.42396194 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus software on offer in Europe (1990) 0.00 
    0.0033876717 = product of:
  0.033876717 = sum of:
    0.022222685 = weight(_text_:der in 5893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022222685 = score(doc=5893,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 5893, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5893)
    0.011654032 = weight(_text_:in in 5893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011654032 = score(doc=5893,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 5893, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5893)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Abstract
    Übersicht der verschiedenen in Europa angebotenen Softwareprodukte zur Thesaurusverwaltung mit Angabe von Bezugsandressen
  16. Schmitz-Esser, W.: How to cope with dynamism in ontologies (2000) 0.00 
    0.0023746404 = product of:
  0.023746405 = sum of:
    0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010092689 = score(doc=152,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
    0.013653717 = product of:
      0.027307434 = sum of:
        0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027307434 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Abstract
    An ontology for application in non-domain specific, plurilingual, multimedia environments is outlined. A Basic Semantic Reference Structure (BSRS) allows a combination of semantic and instance-related descriptions of knowledge under the conditions of both paradigm and real-world change. Guidelines for the application of the model are given. Ontologies are conceived as reflections of what humans think is the World and how the World proceeds. Various kinds of ontologies exist. So, when we are going to speak of dynamism in ontologies, we have to make it clear what sort of ontologies we have in mind
    Date
    3. 1.2002 13:22:08
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  17. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.00 
    9.752656E-4 = product of:
  0.01950531 = sum of:
    0.01950531 = product of:
      0.03901062 = sum of:
        0.03901062 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03901062 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  18. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Defining the conceptual space for a world exhibition : first experiments (1998) 0.00 
    5.0463446E-4 = product of:
  0.010092689 = sum of:
    0.010092689 = weight(_text_:in in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010092689 = score(doc=78,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Abstract
    At a world exhibition such as the EXP02000 in Hanover, where all the major issues discussed in the World will be part of the agenda, and tens of thousands of different topics will be on show, the need to bridge this world of real and virtual objects with the conceptual spaces encountered in the heads of some 40 million expected visitors is obvious. To construct a system to cope with this requirement represents an ambitious task in itself. This paper addresses practical details of this project along with the conceptual basis of the future Visitors Information System
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  19. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Schmitz-Esser, W.: Bibliography of 10 years International Society for Knowledge Organization (1999) 0.00 
    3.904447E-4 = product of:
  0.007808894 = sum of:
    0.007808894 = weight(_text_:in in 6402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007808894 = score(doc=6402,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19937998 = fieldWeight in 6402, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6402)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Abstract
    On the 22nd of July, 1989, the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) was founded. Starting in August 1989 ISKO had an official organ, the journal International Classification. This Journal was founded in 1974 by Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg, the first President of the ISKO. With volume 20 (1993) the name of the journal was changed to Knowledge Organization. This bibliography has been compiled on the occasion of the second decade of ISKO. This bibliography indexes the content of International Classification and Knowledge Organization starting with International Classification volume 16(1989) issue 3 and ending with Knowledge Organization volume 26(1999) issue 3. All articles and all book reviews are included. From the news items, only those for which an author is mentioned and that were especially written for International Classification or Knowledge Organization, are entered in this bibliography. The bibliography also contains the papers of conferences organized by the International Society for Knowledge Organization, one of its national chapters, or sponsored by the ISKO or one of its chapters. If we overlooked a conference of which the papers should have been included, we apologize for this omission. A list of the conferences included can be found in the list of abbreviations. The bibliography is based on the literature that was available to the compilers. However, not all conference proceedings included in the bibliography could be found in sources available to us. In these cases descriptions from the bibliographies in International Classification and Knowledge Organization were used. For a few proceedings the help of national chapters was sought and obtained. They deserve our thanks. The bibliography is ordered according to the classification used for the current bibliography in Knowledge Organization. The complete classification - as it is used now - is published in this issue of Knowledge Organization. The bibliography also includes an Author Index. We want to add that this bibliography is more complete than the bibliographies in International Classification and Knowledge Organization. We hope that you will find this bibliography useful and timely
  20. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬The one million picture bank as a challenge to language engineering and systems design (1994) 0.00 
    3.3297235E-4 = product of:
  0.006659447 = sum of:
    0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 1948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006659447 = score(doc=1948,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1948, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1948)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Abstract
    Considers the practical aspects of creating and searching databases containing very large collections (1 million itms or more) of images. Notes that picture collections of this type and size pose new and unprecendented problems of access and management, not only on the technical and visual levels but also in terms of language and effective social communications. Explains the manner in which these problems are interlinked and makes suggestions as to how some of them may be overcome

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes