Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schoonbaert, D."
  1. Schoonbaert, D.: Personal bibliographic systems (2002) 0.00 
    0.002029588 = product of:
  0.012177527 = sum of:
    0.012177527 = weight(_text_:in in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012177527 = score(doc=4247,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This discussion of Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) features deals with microcomputer programs that manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. Although various partially overlapping terminologies may be encountered in the literature such programs as EndNote, ProCite, and Reference Manager-three of the most popular PBS-have by now become household names in academic circles. Several dozens of similar programs exist, each with its own peculiar combination of desirable and less appropriate features. The names of over 100 PBS examples are listed in Appendix 2.
  2. Schoonbaert, D.: Bib/SEARCH 2.9: ervaringen met een veelzijdig bibliografisch databaseprogramma in een wetenschappelijke bibliotheek (1994) 0.00 
    0.0014500075 = product of:
  0.008700045 = sum of:
    0.008700045 = weight(_text_:in in 1588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008700045 = score(doc=1588,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1588, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1588)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The library of the Prince Leopold Institute for Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium is a specialised research library with some 14.000 books and 550 current periodical subscirptions. Since 1990 the library has used Bib/SEARCH (version 2.9) library management program to provide online catalogue and database information facilities. The system is structured to enable easy transfer of data from other sources, and fields may be defined according to the library' needs. Despite minor problems such as the indexing routine, experience at the Institute has been positive. A new version of the system is currently under development
  3. Schoonbaert, D.: SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID : a comparison of three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces (1996) 0.00 
    0.0012428637 = product of:
  0.007457182 = sum of:
    0.007457182 = weight(_text_:in in 2797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007457182 = score(doc=2797,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2797, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2797)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to compare 3 CD-ROM interfaces working on MEDLINE databases: SPIRS (ver. 3.11) and WinSPIRS (ver. 1.0) from SilverPlatter and OVID (ver. 3.0, DOS and WINDOWS interfaces) from CD Plus Technologies (now OVID Technologies). Though the database is the same, there are substantial differences between the interfaces in the way the data is presented and can be searched. Discusses these different approaches and includes a detailed comparative table. Concludes that all 3 interfaces are good yet none of them is perfect; each has desirable and unfortunate features. Together, they offer an enormous range of possibilities. Users would benefit if most of the better features listed (such as easy menu, free text retrieval, pre exploded thesaurus terms) were implemented in future versions of these interfaces and if system operators were given greater latitude to determine the system defaults appropriate to their specific situations and customers. A full, comparative table of features are presented for SPIRS, WinSPIRS, OVID(DOS) and OVID(Windows)

Years

Languages

Themes