Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Seadle, M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Seadle, M.: Spoken words, unspoken meanings : a DLI2 project ethnography (2000) 0.04
    0.036036275 = product of:
      0.07207255 = sum of:
        0.032993436 = weight(_text_:search in 1235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032993436 = score(doc=1235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1235)
        0.03907912 = product of:
          0.07815824 = sum of:
            0.07815824 = weight(_text_:engine in 1235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07815824 = score(doc=1235,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26447627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.29552078 = fieldWeight in 1235, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1235)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The National Gallery of the Spoken Word (NGSW) is a Digital Library Initiative-funded project based at Michigan State University with multiple internal and external partners. The NGSW is essentially a multicultural enterprise because of the variety of disciplines involved, each of which has a unique micro-culture and mutually-unintelligible specialized language. This article uses an ethnographic approach to describe three NGSW-based research projects: copyright, metadata, and digital preservation. Each of these projects shows some aspect of language-related infrastructure development. The NGSW's partners come from four different units on the Michigan State University campus: the College of Engineering, the College of Education, Matrix (a technology research center in the College of Arts and Letters), and the University Library. External partners include the University of Colorado (Boulder), Northwestern University, and the Chicago Historical Society. The original official letter-of-intent proposed five key points: 1. Founding a National Gallery of the Spoken Word analogous to the National Portrait Gallery for publicly available materials.. 2. Enriching the Gallery with a repository for oral history and other scholarly interview materials.. 3. Developing a practical, widely usable search engine for voice resources.. 4. Developing speech digitization standards.. 5. Testing the Gallery's utility in classroom settings..
  2. Seadle, M.: Content management systems (2006) 0.02
    0.01626087 = product of:
      0.06504348 = sum of:
        0.06504348 = weight(_text_:web in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06504348 = score(doc=2586,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To introduce the special theme issue on "Content management systems". Design/methodology/approach - Each of the articles in the theme are described in brief. Findings - The articles cover a range of topics from implementation to interoperability, object-oriented database management systems, and research about meeting user needs. Originality/value - Libraries have only just begun to realize that their web presence is potentially as rich and complex as their online catalogs, and that it needs an equal amount of management to keep it under control.
    Content
    Einführender Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Content management systems" mit den Beiträgen: Luwak: a content management solution (Matt Benzing) - LibData to LibCMS: One library's evolutionary pathway to a content management system (Paul F. Bramscher, John T. Butler) - Beyond HTML: Developing and re-imagining library web guides in a content management system (Doug Goans, Guy Leach, Teri M. Vogel) - CMS/CMS: content management system/change management strategies (Susan Goodwin, Nancy Burford, Martha Bedard, Esther Carrigan, Gale C. Hannigan) - Untangling a tangled web: a case study in choosing and implementing a CMS () - Building a local CMS at Kent State (Rick Wiggins, Jeph Remley, Tom Klingler) - Migrating a library's web site to a commercial CMS within a campus-wide implementation (Tom Kmetz, Ray Bailey) - Building a collection development CMS on a shoe-string (Regina Beach, Miqueas Dial) - Using web services to promote library-extension collaboration (Jerry Henzel, Barbara S. Hutchinson, Anne Thwaits) - Leveraging resources in a library gateway (Jerry V. Caswell) - Copyright in the networked world: copyright police (Michael Seadle)
  3. Seadle, M.: ¬A love affair with markup (2001) 0.01
    0.0116353305 = product of:
      0.046541322 = sum of:
        0.046541322 = weight(_text_:web in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046541322 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16134618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    It was not love at first sight when I met my first markup language sometime in the 1980s. But XML is different. It has a rich and flexible tag-set that lets it function as a database. It is also starting to have tools that allow Web-based display with standard browsers. Describing XML is not easy, but four aspects seem particularly important: separation of data; tool development; standards; and preservation.
  4. Seadle, M.: Education for twenty-first century librarians (2004) 0.01
    0.0066983635 = product of:
      0.026793454 = sum of:
        0.026793454 = product of:
          0.053586908 = sum of:
            0.053586908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053586908 = score(doc=2998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.4, S.337-339
  5. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.0066983635 = product of:
      0.026793454 = sum of:
        0.026793454 = product of:
          0.053586908 = sum of:
            0.053586908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053586908 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110