Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sen, A."
  1. Mahapatra, R.; Sen, A.: Case base management systems : providing database support to case-based reasoners (1994) 0.00 
    0.0033143433 = product of:
  0.0066286866 = sum of:
    0.0066286866 = product of:
      0.013257373 = sum of:
        0.013257373 = weight(_text_:a in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013257373 = score(doc=525,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Case based reasoning offers a new approach for developing knowledge based systems. Most systems are currently prototypes. A number of research issues need to be resolved to facilitate the transition of these prototypes to large application systems, the primary issue being to develop data management support for these prototypes. Analyzes this data management support and proposes a new concept called a casease management system to perfom data management functions for case based systems
    Type
    a
  2. Sterner, B.; Sen, A.; Witteveen, J.: Consensus and scientific classification (2022) 0.00 
    0.0024857575 = product of:
  0.004971515 = sum of:
    0.004971515 = product of:
      0.00994303 = sum of:
        0.00994303 = weight(_text_:a in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00994303 = score(doc=1103,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Consensus about a classification is defined as agreement on a set of classes (concepts or categories) and their relations (such as generic relations and whole-part relations) for us in forming beliefs. While most research on scientific consensus has focused on consensus about a belief as a mark of truth, we highlight the importance of consensus in justifying shared classificatory language. What sort of consensus, if any, is the best basis for communicating and reasoning with scientific classifications? We describe an often-overlooked coordinative role for consensus that leverage agreement on how to disagree such that actors involved can still achieve one or more shared aims even when they do not agree on shared beliefs or categories. Looking forward, we suggest that investigating structures and methods for coordinative consensus provides an important new direction for research on the epistemic foundations of knowledge organization.
    Type
    a

Authors

Years