Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Seo, J."
  1. Lee, J.-T.; Seo, J.; Jeon, J.; Rim, H.-C.: Sentence-based relevance flow analysis for high accuracy retrieval (2011) 0.00
    2.3255666E-4 = product of:
      0.0034883497 = sum of:
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=4746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional ranking models for information retrieval lack the ability to make a clear distinction between relevant and nonrelevant documents at top ranks if both have similar bag-of-words representations with regard to a user query. We aim to go beyond the bag-of-words approach to document ranking in a new perspective, by representing each document as a sequence of sentences. We begin with an assumption that relevant documents are distinguishable from nonrelevant ones by sequential patterns of relevance degrees of sentences to a query. We introduce the notion of relevance flow, which refers to a stream of sentence-query relevance within a document. We then present a framework to learn a function for ranking documents effectively based on various features extracted from their relevance flows and leverage the output to enhance existing retrieval models. We validate the effectiveness of our approach by performing a number of retrieval experiments on three standard test collections, each comprising a different type of document: news articles, medical references, and blog posts. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach can improve the retrieval performance at the top ranks significantly as compared with the state-of-the-art retrieval models regardless of document type.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.9, S.1666-1675
  2. Ko, Y.; Park, J.; Seo, J.: Improving text categorization using the importance of sentences (2004) 0.00
    1.9733087E-4 = product of:
      0.002959963 = sum of:
        0.002959963 = product of:
          0.005919926 = sum of:
            0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 2557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005919926 = score(doc=2557,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2557, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.1, S.65-79
  3. Ko, Y.; Seo, J.: Text classification from unlabeled documents with bootstrapping and feature projection techniques (2009) 0.00
    1.9733087E-4 = product of:
      0.002959963 = sum of:
        0.002959963 = product of:
          0.005919926 = sum of:
            0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 2452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005919926 = score(doc=2452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.1, S.70-83
  4. Kim, Y.; Seo, J.; Croft, W.B.; Smith, D.A.: Automatic suggestion of phrasal-concept queries for literature search (2014) 0.00
    1.6444239E-4 = product of:
      0.0024666358 = sum of:
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 2692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=2692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.4, S.568-583