-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004)
0.01
0.0142422225 = product of:
0.05696889 = sum of:
0.05696889 = weight(_text_:social in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05696889 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
-
Jacob, E.K.; Shaw, D.: Is a picture worth a thousand words? : classification and graphic symbol systems (1996)
0.01
0.010173016 = product of:
0.040692065 = sum of:
0.040692065 = weight(_text_:social in 5173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040692065 = score(doc=5173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 5173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5173)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Icons are graphic images with functional roles in human-computer interaction. They may be used as conceptual tools to represent the organization of information or as operators affecting an activity such as printing or moving to another document. An icon may represent its referent either as a sign, a purely arbitrary relationship that must be learned by the user; as a pictograph, a visual image of the object represented, or as an ideogram, whre the referent is not a concrete entity but an attribute, a set of attributes, or an abstract concept associated with the referent. The symbolicity of an icon reflects the drgree of representativeness that obtains between an icon and its referent(s). We propose to examine symbolic languages composed of sets of icons and to assess their effectiveness as classificatory structures in terms of: 1) representation of hierarchical structure; 2) level of symbolicity; 3) contexts that promote the capability of icons to represent organization; 4) relationship between an underlying metaphorical framework and iconic representation of the organization; 5) graphic elements of effective symbolic languages; and 6) social or cultural factors related to the effectiveness of icons
-
Shaw, D.: Challenges of information technology in improving information services (1997)
0.01
0.005491857 = product of:
0.021967428 = sum of:
0.021967428 = product of:
0.043934856 = sum of:
0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043934856 = score(doc=3034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3034)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 16:50:03
