Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Shiri, A."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Shiri, A.; Kelly, E.J.; Kenfield, A.; Woolcott, L.; Masood, K.; Muglia, C.; Thompson, S.: ¬A faceted conceptualization of digital object reuse in digital repositories (2020) 0.04 
    0.03693497 = product of:
  0.14773989 = sum of:
    0.14773989 = weight(_text_:digital in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14773989 = score(doc=48,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.74726796 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we provide an introduction to the concept of digital object reuse and its various connotations in the context of current digital libraries, archives, and repositories. We will then propose a faceted categorization of the various types, contexts, and cases for digital object reuse in order to facilitate understanding and communication and to provide a conceptual framework for the assessment of digital object reuse by various cultural heritage and cultural memory organizations.
  2. Shiri, A.: Trend analysis in social tagging : an LIS perspective (2007) 0.01 
    0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The aim of the present study was to identify and categorize social tagging trends and developments as revealed by the analysis of library and information science scholarly and professional literature.

Authors

Years