-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.00
0.002374294 = product of:
0.004748588 = sum of:
0.004748588 = product of:
0.009497176 = sum of:
0.009497176 = weight(_text_:a in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009497176 = score(doc=2930,freq=12.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract
- Type
- a
-
Ohly, P.; Sigel, A.: Einführung in wissensorganisatorische Aspekte bei der Nutzung und Bereitstellung fachlicher Internet-Ressourcen (1998)
0.00
0.0019582848 = product of:
0.0039165695 = sum of:
0.0039165695 = product of:
0.007833139 = sum of:
0.007833139 = weight(_text_:a in 4716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007833139 = score(doc=4716,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4716, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4716)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Topic maps in knowledge organization (2003)
0.00
0.0019187195 = product of:
0.003837439 = sum of:
0.003837439 = product of:
0.007674878 = sum of:
0.007674878 = weight(_text_:a in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007674878 = score(doc=4726,freq=6.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There is a natural overlap and complement between Knowledge Organization (KO) and Topic Maps. I am convinced that KO, with its relevant knowledge of an experiences in concept organization, can strongly contribute in this area. Since this ides impacts both the KO and TM communities, this chapter offers an invitation to anyone interested in TMs to draw from the KO background and to KO experts to include the case of KO with TMs in their research.
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: How can user-oriented depth analysis be constructively guided? (2000)
0.00
0.0016788795 = product of:
0.003357759 = sum of:
0.003357759 = product of:
0.006715518 = sum of:
0.006715518 = weight(_text_:a in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006715518 = score(doc=133,freq=24.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is vital for library and information science to understand the subject indexing process thoroughly. However, document analysis, the first and most important step in indexing, has not received sufficient attention. As this is an exceptionally hard problem, we still do not dispose of a sound indexing theory. Therefore we have difficulties in teaching indexing and in explaining why a given subject representation is "better" than another. Technological advancements have not helped to close this fundamental gap. To proceed, we should ask the right questions instead. Several types of indexer inconsistencies can be explained as acceptable, yet different conceptualizations which resulting of the variety of groups dealing with a problem from their respective viewpoints. Multiple indexed documents are regarded as the normal case. Intersubjectively replicable indexing results are often questionable or do not constitute interesting cases of indexing at all. In the context of my ongoing dissertation in which I intend to develop an enhanced indexing theory by investigating improvements within a social sciences domain, this paper explains user-oriented selective depth analysis and why I chose that configuration. Strongly influenced by Mai's dissertation, I also communicate my first insights concerning current indexing theories. I agree that I cannot ignore epistemological stances and philosophical issues in language and meaning related to indexing and accept the openness of the interpretive nature of the indexing process. Although I present arguments against the employment of an indexing language as well, it is still indispensable in situations which demand easier access and control by devices. Despite the enormous difficulties the user-oriented and selective depth analysis poses, I argue that it is both feasible and useful if one achieves careful guidance of the possible interpretations. There is some hope because the number of useful interpretations is limited: Every summary is tailored to a purpose, audience and situation. Domain, discourse and social practice entail additional constraints. A pluralistic method mix that focusses on ecologically valid, holistic contexts and employs qualitative methods is recommended. Domain analysis urgently has to be made more practical and applicable. Only then we will be able to investigate empirically domains in order to identify their structures shaped by the corresponding discourse communities. We plan to represent the recognized problem structures and indexing questions of relevance to a small domain in formal, ontological computer models -- if we can find such stable knowledge structures. This would allow us to tailor dynamically summaries for user communities. For practical purposes we suggest to assume a less demanding position than Hjorland's "totality of the epistemological potential". It is sufficent that we identify and represent iteratively the information needs of today's user groups in interactive knowledge-based systems. The best way to formalize such knowledge gained about discourse communities is however unknown. Indexers should stay in direct contact with the community they serve or be part of it to ensure agreement with their viewpoints. Checklist/request-oriented indexing could be very helpful but it remains to be demonstrated how well it will be applicable in the social sciences. A frame-based representation or at least a sophisticated grouping of terms could help to express relational knowledge structures. There remains much work to do since in practice no one has shown yet how such an improved indexing system would work and if the indexing results were really "better".
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Zum Wert multipler und adaptiver Indexierung mit Konzeptrahmen für die Sozialwissenschaften (2000)
0.00
0.0016788795 = product of:
0.003357759 = sum of:
0.003357759 = product of:
0.006715518 = sum of:
0.006715518 = weight(_text_:a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006715518 = score(doc=140,freq=6.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001)
0.00
0.0011749709 = product of:
0.0023499418 = sum of:
0.0023499418 = product of:
0.0046998835 = sum of:
0.0046998835 = weight(_text_:a in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046998835 = score(doc=5855,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Organisation verteilten Wissens mit semantischen Wissensnetzen und der Aggregation semantischer Wissensdienste am Beispiel Digitale Bibliotheken/Kulturelles Erbe (2006)
0.00
0.0011749709 = product of:
0.0023499418 = sum of:
0.0023499418 = product of:
0.0046998835 = sum of:
0.0046998835 = weight(_text_:a in 5890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046998835 = score(doc=5890,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5890, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Wissensmanagement in der Praxis : Wann, wie und warum hilft dort Wissensorganisation (nicht)? (2004)
0.00
9.791424E-4 = product of:
0.0019582848 = sum of:
0.0019582848 = product of:
0.0039165695 = sum of:
0.0039165695 = weight(_text_:a in 3172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039165695 = score(doc=3172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Wissensorganisation, Topic Maps und Ontology Engineering : Die Verbindung bewährter Begriffsstrukturen mit aktueller XML Technologie (2004)
0.00
9.791424E-4 = product of:
0.0019582848 = sum of:
0.0019582848 = product of:
0.0039165695 = sum of:
0.0039165695 = weight(_text_:a in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039165695 = score(doc=3236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sigel, A.: Informationsintegration mit semantischen Wissenstechnologien (2006)
0.00
9.693015E-4 = product of:
0.001938603 = sum of:
0.001938603 = product of:
0.003877206 = sum of:
0.003877206 = weight(_text_:a in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003877206 = score(doc=5174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.; Sigel, A.: Introducing terminology-based ontologies : Papers and Materials presented by the authors at the workshop "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" (Poli/Schmitz-Esser/Sigel) at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), Vienna, Austria, July 6th, 2006 (2006)
0.00
8.308299E-4 = product of:
0.0016616598 = sum of:
0.0016616598 = product of:
0.0033233196 = sum of:
0.0033233196 = weight(_text_:a in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033233196 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
