Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeinen%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahmen%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierungs %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
-
Simmons, P.: Preserving compatibility with standard data formats (1994)
0.00
7.63743E-4 = product of: 0.017566089 = sum of: 0.017566089 = product of: 0.035132177 = sum of: 0.035132177 = weight(_text_:international in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.035132177 = score(doc=7129,freq=6.0), product of: 0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of: 3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.44686276 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Librarians in countries without well-established national bibliographic systems increasingly find themselves faced with the problem of establishing local formats for machine-readable cataloguing and for referral data. Often they lack the background and the resources - especially trained staff - either to adopt an existing MARC format or to develop their own. Such international formats as UNIMARC and CCF, despite widespread international use, present problems of their own; MARC formats are not practical for agencies that do not follow standard cataloguing rules, and CCF offers little guidance to agencies wishing to adopt it for local use. A number of techniques useful in adapting and implementing international and national standard formats are presented, with some guidelines for preserving compatibility with standards
-
Simmons, P.: Converting UNIMARC records to CCF (1989)
0.00
3.779547E-4 = product of: 0.008692958 = sum of: 0.008692958 = product of: 0.017385917 = sum of: 0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.017385917 = score(doc=2515,freq=2.0), product of: 0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of: 3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 18(1989) no.3, S.42-45