-
Hagler, R.; Simmons, P.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1982)
0.00
0.0029901238 = product of:
0.034386422 = sum of:
0.013091202 = weight(_text_:und in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013091202 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053460475 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120769 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
0.02129522 = weight(_text_:im in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02129522 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06818426 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120769 = queryNorm
0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Abstract
- Gründliche Darstellung aller mit der Speicherung und Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten (inkl. Sacherschließung) verbundenen Problembereiche. Im Anhang Dokumentation des CANMARC Formats
-
Simmons, P.: Preserving compatibility with standard data formats (1994)
0.00
7.8166E-4 = product of:
0.01797818 = sum of:
0.01797818 = product of:
0.03595636 = sum of:
0.03595636 = weight(_text_:international in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03595636 = score(doc=7129,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08046399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120769 = queryNorm
0.44686276 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Librarians in countries without well-established national bibliographic systems increasingly find themselves faced with the problem of establishing local formats for machine-readable cataloguing and for referral data. Often they lack the background and the resources - especially trained staff - either to adopt an existing MARC format or to develop their own. Such international formats as UNIMARC and CCF, despite widespread international use, present problems of their own; MARC formats are not practical for agencies that do not follow standard cataloguing rules, and CCF offers little guidance to agencies wishing to adopt it for local use. A number of techniques useful in adapting and implementing international and national standard formats are presented, with some guidelines for preserving compatibility with standards
-
Simmons, P.: Converting UNIMARC records to CCF (1989)
0.00
3.8682137E-4 = product of:
0.008896891 = sum of:
0.008896891 = product of:
0.017793782 = sum of:
0.017793782 = weight(_text_:international in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017793782 = score(doc=2515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08046399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120769 = queryNorm
0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 18(1989) no.3, S.42-45