Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sjöbergh, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Sjöbergh, J.: Older versions of the ROUGEeval summarization evaluation system were easier to fool (2007) 0.00 
    0.00270615 = product of:
  0.0054123 = sum of:
    0.0054123 = product of:
      0.0108246 = sum of:
        0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0108246 = score(doc=940,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We show some limitations of the ROUGE evaluation method for automatic summarization. We present a method for automatic summarization based on a Markov model of the source text. By a simple greedy word selection strategy, summaries with high ROUGE-scores are generated. These summaries would however not be considered good by human readers. The method can be adapted to trick different settings of the ROUGEeval package.
    Type
    a