Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sjöbergh, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Sjöbergh, J.: Older versions of the ROUGEeval summarization evaluation system were easier to fool (2007) 0.00 
    0.0031564306 = product of:
  0.009469291 = sum of:
    0.009469291 = product of:
      0.018938582 = sum of:
        0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018938582 = score(doc=940,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    We show some limitations of the ROUGE evaluation method for automatic summarization. We present a method for automatic summarization based on a Markov model of the source text. By a simple greedy word selection strategy, summaries with high ROUGE-scores are generated. These summaries would however not be considered good by human readers. The method can be adapted to trick different settings of the ROUGEeval package.