Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Slavic, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.07
    0.06841164 = sum of:
      0.05509047 = product of:
        0.1652714 = sum of:
          0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1652714 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013321174 = product of:
        0.03996352 = sum of:
          0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996352 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:20:40
  2. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.07
    0.06829181 = sum of:
      0.05509047 = product of:
        0.1652714 = sum of:
          0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1652714 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013201341 = product of:
        0.039604023 = sum of:
          0.039604023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039604023 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003) 0.01
    0.006660587 = product of:
      0.013321174 = sum of:
        0.013321174 = product of:
          0.03996352 = sum of:
            0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03996352 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:26:23
  4. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.0066006705 = product of:
      0.013201341 = sum of:
        0.013201341 = product of:
          0.039604023 = sum of:
            0.039604023 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039604023 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31