Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Smiraglia, R.P."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003) 0.00
    0.002343786 = product of:
      0.026953537 = sum of:
        0.021398142 = product of:
          0.042796284 = sum of:
            0.042796284 = weight(_text_:kataloge in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042796284 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1351219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31672353 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0055553955 = product of:
          0.011110791 = sum of:
            0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011110791 = score(doc=5652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 18:19:54
    Footnote
    Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4
    Theme
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  2. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003) 0.00
    0.0022022957 = product of:
      0.0253264 = sum of:
        0.021398142 = product of:
          0.042796284 = sum of:
            0.042796284 = weight(_text_:kataloge in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042796284 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1351219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31672353 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.733308 = idf(docFreq=388, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 18:19:17
    Theme
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  3. Smiraglia, R.P.: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy : extensing the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts (2004) 0.00
    0.0021712128 = product of:
      0.024968946 = sum of:
        0.01917364 = sum of:
          0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0062852125 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.012888429 = weight(_text_:29 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012888429 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
        0.0057953056 = product of:
          0.011590611 = sum of:
            0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011590611 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 19:05:56
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  4. Sachs, M.Y.; Smiraglia, R.P.: From encyclopedism to domain-based ontology for knowledge management : the evolution of the Sachs Classification (SC) (2004) 0.00
    0.0015964593 = product of:
      0.018359281 = sum of:
        0.009666322 = product of:
          0.019332644 = sum of:
            0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019332644 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:09:53
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  5. Smiraglia, R.P.: Content metadata : an analysis of Etruscan artifacts in a museum of archeology (2005) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata schemes target resources as information-packages, without attention to the distinction between content and carrier. Most schema are derived without empirical understanding of the concepts that need to be represented, the ways in which terms representing the central concepts might best be derived, and how metadata descriptions will be used for retrieval. Research is required to resolve this dilemma, and much research will be required if the plethora of schemes that already exist are to be made efficacious for resource description and retrieval. Here I report the results of a preliminary study, which was designed to see whether the bibliographic concept of "the work" could be of any relevance among artifacts held by a museum. I extend the "works metaphor" from the bibliographic to the artifactual domain, by altering the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. Case studies of Etruscan artifacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in non-documentary artifacts.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:14:41
  6. Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004) 0.00
    9.7151217E-4 = product of:
      0.01117239 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 19:48:12
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Authority control: definition and international experience. Part I"
  7. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The nature of "a work" : implications for the organization of knowledge (2001) 0.00
    8.4054976E-4 = product of:
      0.019332644 = sum of:
        0.019332644 = product of:
          0.038665287 = sum of:
            0.038665287 = weight(_text_:29 in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038665287 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.107-109 (G. Campbell)
  8. Smiraglia, R.P.: Works as signs and canons : towards an epistemology of the work (2000) 0.00
    7.7720976E-4 = product of:
      0.008937912 = sum of:
        0.0031426062 = product of:
          0.0062852125 = sum of:
            0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062852125 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0057953056 = product of:
          0.011590611 = sum of:
            0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011590611 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2002 19:58:23
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  9. Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008) 0.00
    5.886174E-4 = product of:
      0.0067691 = sum of:
        0.0027776978 = product of:
          0.0055553955 = sum of:
            0.0055553955 = weight(_text_:1 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0055553955 = score(doc=1919,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.09595714 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0039914027 = product of:
          0.007982805 = sum of:
            0.007982805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007982805 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    "1. What is? Many of us equate the principle activity of knowledge organization with that of ontology, which at its essence is the revelation of the structure of a domain. Among the essential choices that must be made in the construction of ontology are those involving "IsA" relationships. "What is a" is the primary question that defines what belongs inside a set and what, therefore, does not. Employing Dahlberg's concept-theoretic is one approach to defining the elements that belong in a set, although there are many other approaches as well. Whatever method is used, once a set is constituted its members will be considered to be like each other in some way, in other words, they are thought to be the same in some manner, or to some degree. Which leads naturally to the question of how alike must two entities be to be declared the same? Or its correlate, how dissimilar must they be to be declared different? Pondering this question led me to think about musical works that are of the genre "variations on a theme by X." In such works a composer uses a musical mnemonic-a melody usually-to draw listeners into the aural experience, and then, subsequent iterations all contain this original mnemonic but surround it or manipulate it in various ways. The result is always iterative but never boring because each iteration is subtly (or not so subtly) different from the last. And the technique allows the character of the original to be explored fully as well as for it to be reinterpreted by the current composer. In the end it is not so unlike, although a lot more interesting than, multiple citations by an author of another's works- say, like the way each time I cite Patrick Wilson it comes out a little differently. Same but different. Sameness and difference turn out to be essential philosophical positions. Many of the philosophical points of view brought to bear on knowledge organization suggest one or more points of view about this essential question. Semiotics (for example) suggests that signs are always being interpreted anew, phenomenology suggests entities might appear differently as a matter of their individual perception. All points of view are useful because they all shed light on formerly dark corners of the essential questions in knowledge organization.
    Date
    12. 6.2008 20:18:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 35(2008) no.1, S.3-4
  10. Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation : expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents (2006) 0.00
    4.4094716E-4 = product of:
      0.010141784 = sum of:
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  11. Smiraglia, R.P.: Introducing metadata (2005) 0.00
    4.0990516E-4 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 5731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=5731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 5731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 40(2005) nos.3/4, S.1-15
  12. Smiraglia, R.P.: Rethinking what we catalog : documents as cultural artifacts (2008) 0.00
    3.5022903E-4 = product of:
      0.008055268 = sum of:
        0.008055268 = product of:
          0.016110536 = sum of:
            0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016110536 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2008 14:59:03
  13. Smiraglia, R.P.: "Bridget's Revelationes, Ockham's Tractatus, and Doctrines and Covenanants" : qualitative analysis and epistemological perspectives on theological works (2002) 0.00
    3.381545E-4 = product of:
      0.0077775535 = sum of:
        0.0077775535 = product of:
          0.015555107 = sum of:
            0.015555107 = weight(_text_:1 in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015555107 = score(doc=5627,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Results indicated: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships existed for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works; 2) there was a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the extent of derivation; and, 3) forms and genres were useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature. Qualitative analysis reveals the important aspects of the genres "revelation" and "scripture" among theological works.
    Date
    1. 8.2006 17:35:11
  14. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The progress of theory in knowledge organization (2002) 0.00
    3.149623E-4 = product of:
      0.0072441325 = sum of:
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    We understand "theory" to be a system of testable explanatory statements derived from research. In knowledge organization, the generation of theory has moved from an epistemic stance of pragmatism (based on observation of the construction of retrieval tools), to empiricism (based on the results of empirical research). In the nineteenth century, Panizzi (1841), Cutter (1876), and Dewey (1876), developed very pragmatic tools (i.e., catalogs and classifications), explaining as they did so the principles by which their tools were constructed. By 1950, key papers at a University of Chicago Graduate Library School conference on "Bibliographic Organization" recorded the role of bibliographic organization in civilization (Clapp, 1950) and deemed classification the basis of bibliographic organization (Shera, 1950). In 1961, the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles in Paris brought together key thinkers on the design of catalogs. Wilson (1968) expounded a system for bibliographic apparatus, and provided the framework for empirical theoretical development. In 2000, Svenonius asserted that knowledge organization is accomplished through a bibliographic language (or, more properly through a complex set of bibliographic languages), with semantics, syntax, pragmatics, and rules to govern their implementation. Logical positivism notwithstanding, rationalist and historicist stances have begun to come to the fore of late through the promulgation of qualitative methods, most notably those employed in classification, user-interface design, and bibliometric research.
  15. Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 10's Bookshelf : an editorial (2008) 0.00
    3.149623E-4 = product of:
      0.0072441325 = sum of:
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=2333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The 10th International ISKO Conference is now history, and it was a dynamic bit of history at that. Knowledge organization (the domain) is lively and engaged and engaging, and all of us who work in the domain are in a good spot to benefit from the new trajectories provided by the scholars who brought their research forward this year. As is our custom in this journal, I will leave it to the Classification editor to prepare a full report on the conference. But the Proceedings volume (Arsenault and Tennis 2008), as usual, is a rich resource for analysis of the domain at this particular moment in time. By studying the contents, and in particular by applying bibliometric techniques, we can gain useful insight into the direction of the evolution of knowledge organization. Hjørland (2002) includes bibliometric techniques in his list of eleven approaches to domain analysis because, as he says (p. 436), "it is empirical and based on detailed analysis of connections between individual documents." With reference (and due deference) to White's (2003) analysis of authors as citers, I hereby present this brief analysis of what one might find on the bookshelves of this year's ISKO authors.
  16. Smiraglia, R.P.: Noesis : perception and every day classification (2008) 0.00
    3.149623E-4 = product of:
      0.0072441325 = sum of:
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  17. Smiraglia, R.P.: Crossing cultural boundaries : perspectives an the popularity of works (2003) 0.00
    2.5196982E-4 = product of:
      0.0057953056 = sum of:
        0.0057953056 = product of:
          0.011590611 = sum of:
            0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011590611 = score(doc=2772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  18. Smiraglia, R.P.: Further reflections on the nature of a work : introduction (2002) 0.00
    2.3911135E-4 = product of:
      0.005499561 = sum of:
        0.005499561 = product of:
          0.010999122 = sum of:
            0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010999122 = score(doc=5623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 16:12:00