Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Smiraglia, R.P."
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Content metadata : an analysis of Etruscan artifacts in a museum of archeology (2005) 0.00
    8.941777E-4 = product of:
      0.025931153 = sum of:
        0.025931153 = sum of:
          0.008500358 = weight(_text_:1 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008500358 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02124939 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
          0.017430795 = weight(_text_:29 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017430795 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02124939 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.03448276 = coord(1/29)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata schemes target resources as information-packages, without attention to the distinction between content and carrier. Most schema are derived without empirical understanding of the concepts that need to be represented, the ways in which terms representing the central concepts might best be derived, and how metadata descriptions will be used for retrieval. Research is required to resolve this dilemma, and much research will be required if the plethora of schemes that already exist are to be made efficacious for resource description and retrieval. Here I report the results of a preliminary study, which was designed to see whether the bibliographic concept of "the work" could be of any relevance among artifacts held by a museum. I extend the "works metaphor" from the bibliographic to the artifactual domain, by altering the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. Case studies of Etruscan artifacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in non-documentary artifacts.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:14:41
  2. Park, H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Enhancing data curation of cultural heritage for information sharing : a case study using open Government data (2014) 0.00
    3.0053096E-4 = product of:
      0.008715398 = sum of:
        0.008715398 = product of:
          0.017430795 = sum of:
            0.017430795 = weight(_text_:29 in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017430795 = score(doc=1575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07474871 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02124939 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.03448276 = coord(1/29)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  3. Smiraglia, R.P.: Introducing metadata (2005) 0.00
    2.931158E-4 = product of:
      0.008500358 = sum of:
        0.008500358 = product of:
          0.017000716 = sum of:
            0.017000716 = weight(_text_:1 in 5731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017000716 = score(doc=5731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02124939 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 5731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.03448276 = coord(1/29)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 40(2005) nos.3/4, S.1-15