Smiraglia, R.P.: Keywords, indexing, text analysis : an editorial (2013)
0.00
8.4813323E-4 = product of:
0.009329465 = sum of:
0.009329465 = weight(_text_:of in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009329465 = score(doc=1390,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
- Abstract
- Recently I was asked in earnest why KO doesn't have keywords. To which my reply was to LOL. Really-I laughed, out loud, and then I said "but it does, in every line!" I decided to undertake a little editorial experiment by using the contents of the last two issues of Knowledge Organization - Volume 40 (2013) number 1 contained an editorial, 4 peer-reviewed articles, a book review, a classification issues report, and two substantive letters to the editor. Volume 40 (2013) number 2 contained 5 peer-reviewed articles, some ISKO news, and a bibliographic essay book review; unfortunately at the time this was written number 2 had not been indexed by either service. I decided to compare keywords drawn from Thompson Reuters' Web of ScienceT and EBSCOHost's Library and Information Science and Technology Abstracts with Full Text (LISTA) to the actual keywords pulled from the texts. Full texts were uploaded to Voyeur from Hermeneutica.ca -The Rhetoric of Text Analysis (http://hermeneuti.ca/voyeur/) to derive most frequently used terms (applying an English language stoplist). Table 1 contains those comparative results.
