Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Soergel, D."
  1. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.06
    0.056133352 = sum of:
      0.021032363 = product of:
        0.08412945 = sum of:
          0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08412945 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.03510099 = product of:
        0.07020198 = sum of:
          0.07020198 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07020198 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.04
    0.039302155 = sum of:
      0.018027741 = product of:
        0.072110966 = sum of:
          0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072110966 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021274412 = product of:
        0.042548824 = sum of:
          0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042548824 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
  3. Fidel, R.; Soergel, D.: Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval : a conceptual framework for research (1983) 0.03
    0.025347205 = product of:
      0.05069441 = sum of:
        0.05069441 = product of:
          0.10138882 = sum of:
            0.10138882 = weight(_text_:r in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10138882 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Soergel, D.: Software support for thesaurus construction and display (1994) 0.02
    0.022178805 = product of:
      0.04435761 = sum of:
        0.04435761 = product of:
          0.08871522 = sum of:
            0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 8890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08871522 = score(doc=8890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a
  5. Soergel, D.: Information structure management : a unified framework for indexing and searching in database, expert, information-retrieval, and hypermedia systems (1994) 0.02
    0.019010404 = product of:
      0.03802081 = sum of:
        0.03802081 = product of:
          0.07604162 = sum of:
            0.07604162 = weight(_text_:r in 2984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07604162 = score(doc=2984,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 2984, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2984)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
  6. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.01
    0.014182941 = product of:
      0.028365882 = sum of:
        0.028365882 = product of:
          0.056731764 = sum of:
            0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056731764 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
  7. Huang, X.; Soergel, D.: Relevance: an improved framework for explicating the notion (2013) 0.01
    0.011201989 = product of:
      0.022403978 = sum of:
        0.022403978 = product of:
          0.044807956 = sum of:
            0.044807956 = weight(_text_:r in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044807956 = score(doc=527,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Synthesizing and building on many ideas from the literature, this article presents an improved conceptual framework that clarifies the notion of relevance with its many elements, variables, criteria, and situational factors. Relevance is defined as a Relationship (R) between an Information Object (I) and an Information Need (N) (which consists of Topic, User, Problem/Task, and Situation/Context) with focus on R. This defines Relevance-as-is (conceptual relevance, strong relevance). To determine relevance, an Agent A (a person or system) operates on a representation I? of the information object and a representation N? of the information need, resulting in relevance-as-determined (operational measure of relevance, weak relevance, an approximation). Retrieval tests compare relevance-as-determined by different agents. This article discusses and compares two major approaches to conceptualizing relevance: the entity-focused approach (focus on elaborating the entities involved in relevance) and the relationship-focused approach (focus on explicating the relational nature of relevance). The article argues that because relevance is fundamentally a relational construct the relationship-focused approach deserves a higher priority and more attention than it has received. The article further elaborates on the elements of the framework with a focus on clarifying several critical issues on the discourse on relevance.
  8. Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014) 0.01
    0.010637206 = product of:
      0.021274412 = sum of:
        0.021274412 = product of:
          0.042548824 = sum of:
            0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042548824 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.01
    0.0088643385 = product of:
      0.017728677 = sum of:
        0.017728677 = product of:
          0.035457354 = sum of:
            0.035457354 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035457354 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  10. Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015) 0.01
    0.0088643385 = product of:
      0.017728677 = sum of:
        0.017728677 = product of:
          0.035457354 = sum of:
            0.035457354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035457354 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2015 20:52:22
  11. Soergel, D.: SemWeb: proposal for an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology (1996) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 3575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=3575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  12. Soergel, D.; Popescu, D.: Organization authority database design with classification principles (2015) 0.01
    0.007511559 = product of:
      0.015023118 = sum of:
        0.015023118 = product of:
          0.06009247 = sum of:
            0.06009247 = weight(_text_:authors in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06009247 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We illustrate the principle of unified treatment of all authority data for any kind of entities, subjects/topics, places, events, persons, organizations, etc. through the design and implementation of an enriched authority database for organizations, maintained as an integral part of an authority database that also includes subject authority control / classification data, using the same structures for data and common modules for processing and display of data. Organization-related data are stored in information systems of many companies. We specifically examine the case of the World Bank Group (WBG) according to organization role: suppliers, partners, customers, competitors, authors, publishers, or subjects of documents, loan recipients, suppliers for WBG-funded projects and subunits of the organization itself. A central organization authority where each organization is identified by a URI, represented by several names and linked to other organizations through hierarchical and other relationships serves to link data from these disparate information systems. Designing the conceptual structure of a unified authority database requires integrating SKOS, the W3C Organization Ontology and other schemes into one comprehensive ontology. To populate the authority database with organizations, we import data from external sources (e.g., DBpedia and Library of Congress authorities) and internal sources (e.g., the lists of organizations from multiple WBG information systems).