Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Song, M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. An, J.; Kim, N.; Kan, M.-Y.; Kumar Chandrasekaran, M.; Song, M.: Exploring characteristics of highly cited authors according to citation location and content (2017) 0.01 
    0.01485364 = product of:
  0.02970728 = sum of:
    0.02970728 = product of:
      0.11882912 = sum of:
        0.11882912 = weight(_text_:authors in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11882912 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22701477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979689 = queryNorm
            0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Big Science and cross-disciplinary collaborations have reshaped the intellectual structure of research areas. A number of works have tried to uncover this hidden intellectual structure by analyzing citation contexts. However, none of them analyzed by document logical structures such as sections. The two major goals of this study are to find characteristics of authors who are highly cited section-wise and to identify the differences in section-wise author networks. This study uses 29,158 of research articles culled from the ACL Anthology, which hosts articles on computational linguistics and natural language processing. We find that the distribution of citations across sections is skewed and that a different set of highly cited authors share distinct academic characteristics, according to their citation locations. Furthermore, the author networks based on citation context similarity reveal that the intellectual structure of a domain differs across different sections.
  2. Song, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Chambers, T.: Productivity and influence in bioinformatics : a bibliometric analysis using PubMed central (2014) 0.01 
    0.012127946 = product of:
  0.024255892 = sum of:
    0.024255892 = product of:
      0.09702357 = sum of:
        0.09702357 = weight(_text_:authors in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09702357 = score(doc=1202,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22701477 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979689 = queryNorm
            0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bioinformatics is a fast-growing field based on the optimal use of "big data" gathered in genomic, proteomics, and functional genomics research. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive and in-depth bibliometric analysis of the field of bioinformatics by extracting citation data from PubMed Central full-text. Citation data for the period 2000 to 2011, comprising 20,869 papers with 546,245 citations, was used to evaluate the productivity and influence of this emerging field. Four measures were used to identify productivity; most productive authors, most productive countries, most productive organizations, and most popular subject terms. Research impact was analyzed based on the measures of most cited papers, most cited authors, emerging stars, and leading organizations. Results show the overall trends between the periods 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007 were dissimilar, while trends between the periods 2004 to 2007 and 2008 to 2011 were similar. In addition, the field of bioinformatics has undergone a significant shift, co-evolving with other biomedical disciplines.
  3. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01 
    0.010120187 = product of:
  0.020240374 = sum of:
    0.020240374 = product of:
      0.040480748 = sum of:
        0.040480748 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040480748 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17438023 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979689 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  4. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.01 
    0.008433489 = product of:
  0.016866978 = sum of:
    0.016866978 = product of:
      0.033733957 = sum of:
        0.033733957 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033733957 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17438023 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979689 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22

Authors

Themes