Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sparck Jones, K."
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC : TREC-2 (1995) 0.05 
    0.0493965 = product of:
  0.07409475 = sum of:
    0.051577676 = weight(_text_:management in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051577676 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
    0.022517072 = product of:
      0.045034144 = sum of:
        0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045034144 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the TREC programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within it in terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.291-314
  2. Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC (1997) 0.04 
    0.03704738 = product of:
  0.055571064 = sum of:
    0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038683258 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
    0.016887804 = product of:
      0.03377561 = sum of:
        0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03377561 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the Text REtrieval Conferences (TREC) programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within its terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck aus: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.192-314