Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sparck Jones, K."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The role of artificial intelligence in information retrieval (1991) 0.02 
    0.022857709 = product of:
  0.10666931 = sum of:
    0.051419973 = weight(_text_:wide in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051419973 = score(doc=4811,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1312982 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
    0.021355784 = weight(_text_:information in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021355784 = score(doc=4811,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=4811,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Presents a view of the scope of artificial intelligence (AI) in information retrieval (IR). Considers potential roles of AI and IR, evaluating AI from a realistic point od view and within a wide information management potential, not just because AI is itself insufficiently developed, but because many information management tasks are properly shallow information processing ones. There is nevertheless an important place for specific applications of AI or AI-derived technology when particular constraints can be placed on the information management tasks involved
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991) no.8, S.558-565
  2. Sparck Jones, K.; Jones, G.J.F.; Foote, J.T.; Young, S.J.: Experiments in spoken document retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.008935094 = product of:
  0.06254566 = sum of:
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
    0.055482898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055482898 = score(doc=1951,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.61896384 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Describes experiments in the retrieval of spoken documents in multimedia systems. Speech documents pose a particular problem for retrieval since their words as well as contents are unknown. Addresses this problem, for a video mail application, by combining state of the art speech recognition with established document retrieval technologies so as to provide an effective and efficient retrieval tool. Tests with a small spoken message collection show that retrieval precision for the spoken file can reach 90% of that obtained when the same file is used, as a benchmark, in text transcription form
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Readings in informatio retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.493-502.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.4, S.399-417
  3. Lewis, D.D.; Sparck Jones, K.: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.008009522 = product of:
  0.05606665 = sum of:
    0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014125523 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  4. Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC : TREC-2 (1995) 0.01 
    0.006472671 = product of:
  0.045308694 = sum of:
    0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011415146 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
    0.033893548 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033893548 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Discusses the TREC programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within it in terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.291-314
  5. Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC (1997) 0.01 
    0.0059455284 = product of:
  0.041618697 = sum of:
    0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0104854815 = score(doc=580,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
    0.031133216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031133216 = score(doc=580,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the Text REtrieval Conferences (TREC) programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within its terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck aus: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.192-314
    Imprint
    The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
  6. Lewis, D.D.; Sparck Jones, K.: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1997) 0.01 
    0.005054501 = product of:
  0.035381503 = sum of:
    0.011415146 = weight(_text_:information in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011415146 = score(doc=575,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
    0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023966359 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Imprint
    The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
  7. Strzalkowski, T.; Sparck Jones, K.: NLP track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.00 
    0.0025678244 = product of:
  0.03594954 = sum of:
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  8. Sparck Jones, K.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Introduction: automatic summarizing (1995) 0.00 
    5.7655195E-4 = product of:
  0.008071727 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-630

Authors

Themes